Several years ago my cousin's friend (I'll call her Sue) attended a Roman Catholic university in the States, which had (and still has) a 'sexual activity' conduct policy, given the RC position on sex before marriage. Students who are (somehow) found to have broken this policy can be referred to a conduct hearing.
Sue was raped during the second semester of her sophomore year, reported it the same night, and the relevant tests were done. The medical report detailed bruising/marks, which could be consistent with rape. However at the hearing, the conduct body believed her rapist's claim that it was 'consensual rough sex', and he was cleared.
As the medical report had shown that sexual intercourse had taken place, and the fact the conduct body believed the rapist's story about it being consensual sex , Sue was then referred to a conduct hearing for breaking the 'sexual activity' policy. I kid you not.
Sue was found guilty of breaking the sexual activity conduct policy, and was referred for spiritual counselling, banned from student housing for her junior year, and was given a written warning.
Her rapist also had to attend a second hearing for breaking the sexual conduct policy, was found guilty, but his only punishment was being referred for spiritual counselling. They decided not to punish him further, as being 'falsely accused of rape' would apparently have already taught him a valuable lesson.
It appears this particular university has form for handling sexual assault cases badly, as it was featured in The Hunting Ground documentary, and subsequently made changes to its practices.
NB: Sue transferred to a different college to complete her final two years.