Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sunday Times-childcare costs statistics

10 replies

CakeAndChocolate · 24/04/2016 21:49

I've seen this a few times on my Facebook feed. It really winds me up, why couldn't they have written "a parent"? Why does it assume childcare costs are the sole responsibility of a mother?

Sunday Times-childcare costs statistics
OP posts:
CakeAndChocolate · 25/04/2016 07:22

Looks like I'm on my own with this one!

OP posts:
insancerre · 25/04/2016 07:27

No, I'm with you
Childcare costs are shared household coists
They don't just come one wage
Plus childcare costs don't last forever and there is an argument about spending in the short term to benefit in the long term

slugseatlettuce · 25/04/2016 07:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheBestChocolateIsFree · 25/04/2016 07:31

No I agree it's irritating. It also winds up my inner pedant....."where? Knightsbridge? Gateshead? What if she lives within walking distance of work? What about childcare tax credits? Or childcare vouchers - from one or both parents' employers?"

And pension contributions are a profit unless you're planning to die young.

Mner · 25/04/2016 07:34

It grated on me too when I read it on Facebook!

mellysam · 25/04/2016 07:39

I totally agree, the lack of the word 'parent' always bugs me. And plucking random numbers from nowhere and printing it with no evidence of where those figures came from is also ridiculous.
It also annoys me when people state 'women' do this or 'men' do this, I think you'll find that 'people' would be more accurate as it's not always their sex which makes them behave a certain way, people are different!!
Rant over and breathe Wink

CurlyBlueberry · 28/04/2016 15:42

I saw this last week shared in a private Facebook group and wrote almost exactly the same as you in response! It particularly winds me up because it's as if the author (who could be male or female) wants to appear "female-friendly"/"feminist" but has completely missed the glaring, sexist background assumption that childcare costs are borne solely by the woman.

MarthaCliffYouCunt · 28/04/2016 15:44

Yes ive seen it a couple of times too. On one occasion i posted under it "good thing kids have two parents then" (got no response). Its a bollocks 'fact'. It has no meaning.

MorrisZapp · 28/04/2016 15:45

I saw that on fb and made a long comment about sexism.

MarthaCliffYouCunt · 28/04/2016 15:46

It also implies that travel costs and pension contributions are a result of being a parent rather than a cost of working. They would exist whether the person had kids or not. Like i said, its bollocks.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page