I've just finished Daniel Deronda which like other works of George Eliot discusses the role of marriage in women's lives and how the patriarchy controls them.
So much of what I read about marriage in the 21st c. suggests that the definition of marriage has moved on from 150 years ago and marriage had been redefined to be about equality and love rather than establishing social order, the patriarchy and maintaining status. Yet despite this, so many of the relationships in this book - marriages motivated by inheritance, increased status or "the need to rescue another" - still ring true today.
Is there more to the modern conceptualisation of marriage than recognising the right of love an equality?
In my case, my husband and I are from different countries and one of the motives for us marrying was that we would have the security of knowing we could continue to live together. However, I feel the modern definition of love and equality, cheapens the motive of security i.e. ours isn't a real marriage in some people's eyes as it could be seen as a visa marriage.
Is marriage still an instrument of the patriarchy? Our people actually less honest about the reasons they get married these days than 150 years ago?