Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Germaine Greer doesn't agree with David Furnish being named as 'mother' on birth certificate

219 replies

Athenaviolet · 26/05/2015 20:08

And neither do I!

www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/germaine-greer-slams-elton-john-5758530?ICID=FB_mirror_main

Is the word 'mother' just meaningless now?

I didn't even realise this was legally possible.

OP posts:
Viviennemary · 26/05/2015 21:55

Of course he is not the mother. It is a blatant inaccuracy and untruth and I am amazed it was allowed on the birth certificate. Money talks.

KatharineClifton · 26/05/2015 21:58

Have you seen the birth certificates Viviennemary?

Greer is being disingenuous. As she often is.

peltata · 26/05/2015 22:03

Surely recent law changes are showing that areas such as birth certificates need updating to accommodate the points people have raised.

This assumes Greer is correct - she seems off target more often than not of late IMHO.

Viviennemary · 26/05/2015 22:07

No I haven't. I took the post at face value that a man was described as a child's mother.

OrlandoWoolf · 26/05/2015 22:09

Surely recent law changes are showing that areas such as birth certificates need updating to accommodate the points people have raised

And wedding certificates - do they still have husband / wife on them?

Life has changed. Some people said that same sex marriage makes the word marriage meaningless now.

You are still their mother. But other people who have not given birth to the child can also be their mother.

I think the certificate is out of date. If it's a baby born to 2 men - the biological father is the biological father. But both men are fathers. Or both men are parents - and do the job of a parent - ideally a father and mother should do the same role. Except where biologically difficult.

FloraFox · 26/05/2015 22:15

An egg is just a blank canvas.

I'm still wondering what this means.

Athenaviolet · 26/05/2015 22:20

lurcio I think that's a good idea about the 'private' & 'public' birth certs.

Employers should be able to see all of that but the DC should.

OP posts:
WhirlpoolGalaxyM51 · 26/05/2015 22:20

It's an interesting one this.

I think maybe parent 1 / parent 2 etc may be the way forward and with a second part as others have posted for information for the child only.

I agree that mothers / fathers don't need to be the bio parent in order to fulfil that role, so really all that is left is either the stereotypical roles of mother / father, and/or the sex of the parent.

So eg my DH is a bloke but he's more stereotypically maternal than me. That doesn't mean that I'm the father and he's the mother and society would think us odd if we had got our children to describe us that way.

So it's down to sex, then. Men are fathers and women are mothers and they fulfil the role however because obviously gender roles = bad...?

My gut feel is that both men are fathers and I feel uncomfortable with a man being legally the mother. But I'm not sure why. All the laws and so forth deal directly with pregnancy / giving birth and so forth so no issue there I imagine.

I suppose maybe it just feels like a lot of "female" roles are being occupied my men at the moment? And with things the way they are the women who used to do them get pushed out. Like there was some big ceremony we were watching last year and there was a song about how everyone could be free and do whatever they felt and wasn't it great and this was accompanied by young women in skimpy clothes + men in pretty frocks / skimpy clothes. And I thought, well they haven't got a contingent of women in there expressing their liberation by not adhering to the beauty standard. Or, being over 40 or something.

Dunno. It's not an entire thought but it's just in a society which thinks men are better, then to have them colonising the only areas we were deemed to be any good for feels like a bit of a loss. And maybe a bit of a worry. So it's like, well if women won't play ball (adhering to ornamental status, being satisfied in a traditional mummy role) then we can ditch them and just get men to do it instead.

almondcakes · 26/05/2015 22:21

Orlando, why is ideal for a mother and father to do the same as two father Said? I don't know what that means.

Aside from that, I don't see what the point is of a men being described as a mother or a woman as a father on a birth certificate. The word parent seems fine.

I think if any of this has happened, it is in another country. It doesn't sound anything like what happens in the UK.

OrlandoWoolf · 26/05/2015 22:24

Orlando, why is ideal for a mother and father to do the same as two father

I meant that there should be no difference in the role of a mother or father. If someone described in words what they do as a parent, it should not be possible to say if they were a mother or father. Unless they said they woke up to BF at 2am of course.

Athenaviolet · 26/05/2015 22:26

Shouldn't

OP posts:
WhirlpoolGalaxyM51 · 26/05/2015 22:26

So no prescribed gender roles I guess which is a great plan, each according to their strengths is better to my mind in everything. (And compromise on the rest!).

WhirlpoolGalaxyM51 · 26/05/2015 22:28

It does feel very retrograde in terms of nuclear families and heteronormative roles.

Does anyone know if this story is even true?

almondcakes · 26/05/2015 22:31

Two of the main reasons why the mother is always named on the birth certificate and the father is optional is for two important human rights reasons, according to the UN:

Right to a nationality: by making the father optional, children of single mothers are able to be registered, something which they have frequently been denied and in some locations still are.

Freedom from trafficking and slavery: the birth mother being on the original certificate helps prevent the trafficking of children and the slavery of pregnant women.

Changing any of this based on people's feelings about roles seems dubious in comparison, and I don't think is happening in the UK.

Athenaviolet · 26/05/2015 22:34

As I see it DCs can have up to 3 'mothers'. A genetic mother (egg), a gestational mother (surrogate) and a 'social' mother ie who they call 'mum' on a day to day basis, this may be an adoptive or biological mother (or other carer eg kinship carer/stepmother).

DCs should be able to find out who all these people are. As someone with genetic medical conditions in my family I don't think the significance of a DCs genetic history should be ignored to spare the feelings of adoptive parents.

OP posts:
OutsSelf · 26/05/2015 22:37

The thing is that motherhood confers not just a particular relationship but actually some significant social disadvantages. Fathers for example are not judged a bad bet for promotion at work. Motherhood means real disadvantages AS well as lots of lovely stuff, but David really is only taking on the lovely stuff. So yeah, I feel that those things you can ONLY give up, as a mother, like your equality with your colleagues in the eyes of society and more meaningfully, your HR director and boss, are made invisible by this very rich man's appropriation of something which defines me, whether I like it or not. And he could just opt out, by deciding 'dad' will do. Without any problem or comeback, or loss of relationship, status or family. It feels like he's playing a game with something really important to me

OutsSelf · 26/05/2015 22:39

If he was suddenly at the barricades for maternity provision, I'd be a bit less skeptical

BeCool · 26/05/2015 22:41

He us not a mother. He's a parent.

WhirlpoolGalaxyM51 · 26/05/2015 22:43

Well he's a male parent aka a father or dad.

If there was no other option on the bit of paper then that's a problem with the bit of paper, that there was nowhere else to put both of them.

If they chose this above father 1 father 2 or something then, like I say, I don't really like that but it's not sorted out in my head yet why that is.

Arsenic · 26/05/2015 22:45

Short and Long versions of B/certs were introduced for a similar reason - to conceal illegitimacy. The system could be adapted.

almondcakes · 26/05/2015 22:45

In the UK, social parents of a surrogate baby fill in a parental order. There is no section to fill in for mother other than the details of the surrogate mother. The two social parents are applicant one and applicant two.

PuffinsAreFictitious · 26/05/2015 22:48

Just to reiterate, this isn't the child's birth certificate. That will have the child's birth mother's name on it.

From examples of adoption certificates I've looked at online, it doesn't have 'Mother' 'Father' boxes, as there are on a birth certificate. It just has the name/s of the adopters. Which makes me wonder what the truth of this story is. Furnish patently cannot be the child's biological mother, so can't be registered on a birth certificate in that capacity.

OutsSelf · 26/05/2015 22:48

Always impressed by your knowledge of form filling, Almond Grin

Arsenic · 26/05/2015 22:50

Are you talking about the US system Puffins?

almondcakes · 26/05/2015 22:50

We have a surrogate baby in my extended family, OutsSelf, so members of my family have recently been through this process!