With the staggeringly low rates of conviction in cases of rape, it is not possible to say whether any one man is a rapist who got off, was falsely accused or it was a case representing the mismatch between the woman's lack of consent and the man's reasonable belief in her consent. However it is possible to say from the statistics that a large proportion of the men who are not convicted are actually rapists and almost all of the women who make complaints of rape did not consent to sex.
In light of this, it seems obvious that steps need to be taken to increase the level of conviction to obtain justice for the women who have been raped and nothing is done about it. It is telling however that there is this usual rush to demand anonymity for a group of men, most of who are actually rapists.
I find it particularly despicable that the reason given for anonymity is that the women get anonymity. This is a typical MRA position commonly taken up by liberal men. It ignores the structural inequity that gives rise to the problem and focusses on the rights of individual men and a determination to demand a formal equality that actually perpetuates oppression. It reminds me of this: