We work in London, our head office is on Pacific time - 8 hours behind.
They bought us relatively recently. Our head office was in NY, only 5 hours behind, which gives you all afternoon every day for conference calls. Pacific time means there is really only one hour a day for conference calls - their 9am is our 5pm.
I hesitate to frame this as a feminist issue because I don't want to buy into the idea that childcare is only for women. (In my case, I am lucky to have flexibility because my dp works locally and is always home for the dcs when I work late.) However, things being what they are, it does seem to be the mothers in our office who struggle with this. One in particular had working hours set as finishing at 5 to get to childcare at 6. This can't happen when we have team meetings. Realistically we do need 4 or 5 meetings a week, this is not one-off stuff.
I have found my LA colleagues, as individuals, very flexible and reasonable. I will work any time that makes sense, would rather get home for dc's bathtime and work later from home than miss them, and I can do that when working with a group over there, but we can't put in team meetings for 8pm UK time when they involve other UK people. I have also had calls with individual people working from home at 7.30am LA time. But the difficulty is team meetings - how can you schedule for 8 people, 4 each on either side of the world, without someone being put out?
My view is that we should be thinking more laterally. The assumption is that everyone will stay as late as they need to. I feel differently - I will put in the hours that I am needed to, but I don't want them always to be the precious one or two where my children are awake. And later evening time is actually more expendable to me from a family perspective.
It is outrageous to suggest that sometimes team meetings could be later, so all the UK people are dialling in at 8 or 9 pm?
What does everyone think?