I didn't say "men do it too so it's OK" - that's not my point at all. What I'm saying is in itself, pole dancing can be separated from its lapdancing connotations. It can be done by men, it can be done by women in a way that is not for men, it can be simply exercise or dance.
So it isn't like, say, a lapdancing class where you learn to gyrate and pout and pick fivers up with your flaps, and there's really no other point in doing those things except as a sleazy entertainment. I'm drawing that distinction.
Whenthered said:
"When men make up a significant portion of the participants; when women stop doing the exercise in make-up, bikinis and high heels (arf at how wearing high heels makes it a better work-out); and when watching women pole dancing stops being primarily a male sexual activity; then I might be persuaded that pole dancing could be a feminist exercise."
I agree with this, but then you can't get to that point unless we start behaving in those ways. So as a feminist, in a way that I realise might be seen as perverse, I applaud Emeli Sande woman, and anyone else like her, who brings pole dancing away from the sleaze and makes it into something else - that can be about exercise and dance in an equal, non-dodgy way.
I'm thinking aloud and still deciding what I think on this thread, but I am NOT just saying "men can do it so it's OK". The point is a man could do it in the same way as Emeli Sande woman did it, in the same terms, for the same reasons, and in that sense she is putting it in the sphere of equality.
Also, I don't think feminism is about choice, as I've said many times, like a stuck record. It's not feminist to say any choice a woman makes is OK, just because she's a woman. (If that were the case what do we say about woman who take part in FGM or promote being a surrendered wife? They think they are doing the right thing.)