I agree with your words SinsterSal
(NB I was having to get a response in there in a carpark bouncing off indoor wifi so what I could read and see was a bit limited)...
But:
The political objections come in against people peddling the Happy Hooker Empowered Glamourous PhD funding narrative as though it were representative.
Funny thing...you can read through every single thing on my blog, I will cheerfully give you my real name by PM and you can read everything I have ever written online (though I recommend avoiding aforesaid and just TAKING MY WORD FOR IT
cos I can rant on...) and you will see I have NEVER "peddled" anything of the kind in my life...
EVEN SO I find I am putting in more than full time week fighting individuals and organisations determined to impede women in using sex work to survive with exceptionally dishonest propaganda campaigns to "end the demand"...
That makes me a tad bad tempered on the subject...and those are the people who need to STAND CLEAR...
No Demand = No Money = No Survival
Survival trumps all.
We all have a right to survive by the means most accessible to us, and we all share an obligation to refrain from interfering in the survival of others.
...incidentally, deriving a realistic income from selling sex is ALWAYS, without exception, more empowering than destitution.
I hope MsPenguin finds plenty of alternatives, but if, heaven forbid, she doesn't, she certainly will not be "harming other women" and I only wish I could lay my hands on anyone who put it into her poor head that she or anyone who sells sex, might be.