There's been a bit of coverage about a photo that came out of the Australian wildfires. This piece by Luke Harding in the Guardian isn't too bad.
Basically, grandparents babysitting 5 grandchildren - fire comes in fast and there's no escape. Grandmother takes the children (3 of them non-swimmers) down to the jetty and so they can try and stay safe in the water. Not certain what the grandfather is doing, but it sounds like he's trying to see what he can do to save the property. He joins them later (dramatic run through the woods described) and takes photos of them on the jetty about to get in and then of grandmother and the five children (3 non-swimmers remember) in the water clinging on to the jetty.
But a couple of other pieces in the guardian have really annoyed me. This video - in the blurb it says "An Australian grandfather saved his wife and five grandchildren by ordering them to shelter under a jetty during a bushfire." Where as the reality is that Tammy ("Tim's wife" as she's reffered to several times) saved the 5 kids by taking them to the water (Just like to emphasize again - 3 of them non-swimmers) on her own. It seems to me she's the hero here.
Then in a comment is free piece by Jonathon Jones "grandfather Tim Holmes took his family to shelter in the sea" and again I think - no he damn well didn't. Tammy took them to the water. And from what we see, Tammy did the hard work of keeping the kids safe.
In my opinion the photos are powerful and do huge amounts to communicate the devastating human toll of the wild fires. The main photo of them all in the water they look terrified. And I can only think what the hell was that man doing fucking around with a camera while his grandkids were crying and his wife was struggling to keep their heads out of the water?
I do think we benefit as a society from photos like this, so I don't want to lay into that sdie of it too much. I'm mainly really annoyed that the story that is told is of the hero man, when to me the hero that shines out is the woman.