I started the thread over there as I thought I'd be preaching to the converted over here. Gotta say I was disappointed to read Teeb's account of her/ her friend's experience of the Poppy Project, I hope I have not caused any offence in my response to Teeb. As stated the Poppy Project were perfectly appropriate when I called them on behalf of a client.
I have just gone back to the thread to clarify my position as the OP:
"the vast majority of prostituion is exploitation and as explored in this thread, even where women DO purport to enter in to prostitution willingly there is a clear link with childhood sexual abuse.
With regards to the punters, I believe the majority to be misogynistic bullies who get off on power and control. In my experience (as a human and as a child protection social worker), men who pay for sex, domestic violence perpetrators and chid sex offenders all fit a similar psychological profile.
Lastly, I am hugely passionate about rights of people with disabilities (sibling has down syndrome and have worked in this area also) but I don't believe for one second that their rights trump that of exploited women. I think many disabled people would share my view"
Sadly there doesn't seem to be any actual discussion about the content of the report, instead it has descended into a misinformed debate about the 'rights' of disabled men to have sex. Thread fail :(