Urgh - I spent time reading this earlier today and kind of wish I hadn't. Way too long and seriously lost it towards the end, all so she could say that the movement needs more intersectionality? So unnecessary and yet again, taking the media's portrayal of 'the new feminism' as monolithic.
The problem is, it's not a case of 'feminists today' not caring about race and class and politics at all. Part of the problem is that the 'feminist resurgence' in the UK, whether you agree with their opinions or not, has been defined by the media as being all about Object, UK Feminista, LFN, etc. The media also only gives coverage to protests about strip clubs, Playboy, anything related to sex or something 'provocative', or anything it can mock. The wider concerns of the movement get far less coverage and so we then have the comments on CiF and on other sites saying 'Why don't these silly, privileged, prissy women care about more important issues?!'
I didn't appreciate the tone Turner took when describing the activists. Of course analysis of race and class is important. Mocking women who choose to focus on porn, or prostitution, for example, just came across as nasty. IMO, groups like Object have recently become an easy target for people criticising feminism today, people who don't actually look deeper into the things feminists are doing.