Set texts at school

[MillyR]

Sorry that this is a bit of a thread about a thread, but in education there is a thread discussing Of Mice and Men still being a set text at GCSE. Nobody has mentioned in that thread that it is a book about a man killing a woman. As Steinbeck wrote:

She is 'not a person, she's a symbol. She has no function, except to be a foil ? and a danger to Lennie.'

This is in addition to 'Atonement' and "To Kill A Mocking Bird' both being set texts. In both of these a woman makes false accusations about who is the rapist. So in all three books a woman is harmed but we are pushed towards sympathising with a male character.

I am just wondering if this has a bit of an impact. When I was at school we did 'The Color Purple' and it had a major impact on me. I know these books must be looked at critically in schools, but criticising the books doesn't really cancel out the impact of the stories. Of Mice and Men is particularly sentimental and melodramatic so designed to move the reader to care about the killer.

Did anybody study these books at school, or teach them?

To Kill A Mockingbird is far from black and white (pun intended) about the false accusation. It's pretty clear that she is forced into the accusation by threats from her abusive father.

It is still a book about the impact of false accusations rather than the impact of being raped though.

well it is about mayella's abuse as well though isn't it? that was sort of the point, I thought, that it was easier to condemn an innocent man to death than to tell the truth about her father?

When I teach Of Mice and Men, I always encourage discussion about Curley's Wife and her lack of identity / freedom / voice. I personally think it's a very interesting theme in the novel, alongside the racial and class prejudices.

Admittedly, the teenagers I teach do find it difficult to see things from CW's point of view, and occasionally one will come out with that gem: "she deserved it"

I suppose I just think it would be more appropriate to study a book about the aftermath of rape which doesn't involve a false accusation. But perhaps such a book is widely studied in schools and I'm just unaware of it.

I read Of mice and men 25 years ago at school and to be honest, I had completely forgotten the female character who is killed by Lenny. I remember vividly the interplay between the brothers, the depiction of Lenny's SN, his brither's defence of him and ultimate killing of him. But the woman made no impact on me whatsoever.
Which goes to show how unimportant she is, what a non-character.
And suddenly your post strikes a real cord with me, 25 years later.

at dp's school they teach (or at least used to, not sure now) angela carter's the magic toyshop at A level, which I htinink is pretty enlightened of them. the problem is it's a boys' school (though with some girlsin the sixth form) and they hve had lots of complaints because the boys can't ;'engage' with it apparently

just to clarify I think the lack of engagement with such a topic is he probelm that should be tackled

think I agree with you millyr but not sure what would be worse - the current texts or something by Alice sebold

you were lucky to do color purple at school though

I've just had a look and 'I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings' is a set text for WJEC, but I don't know if a lot of schools choose it.

God, my spelling is appalling tonight.
Chord. Not cord.

Toni Morrison too

actually there are loads of good ones aren't there?

(I mean loads to choose from not loads studied for gcse)

And now I've just looked up DS's set texts for year 10 and he will be doing both To Kill A Mocking Bird and Of Mice and Men!

I did The Color Purple too (and Oranges are Not the Only Fruit, same year), and it made a huge impact on me too - our teacher brought in some of Walker's writings about Womanism, too.

It's a real shame it's 'lucky' to do a text like that - but it is.

I think there would be no problem with, say one of the texts mentioned in Milly's OP - it'd be good to discuss what's disturbing there and why. But three?! I agree, that is really not good.

Well you can take any piece of literature and analyse it from a feminist perspective. So it doesn't really matter what text you study.

And I certainly studied more than three texts for a level - we studies Wuthering Heights, shelagh Delaney, and Sylvia Plath among the more traditional Shakespeare, Arthur miller, Chaucer, Great Gatsby, Tennessee Williams etc

Oh and Song of Solomon - Toni Morrison. I loved my eng lit A level

Surely 'I know why the caged bird sings' would be a bit too much for GCSE age, A level maybe?

We did An Inspector Calls, Of Mice and Men, Some Shakespeare and some WW1 and 16/17th poems for GCSE.

Didn't do A-Level English BUT did do A-Level Italian and the set text for that was by a female author (Lara Cardella). It talked about a teenage girl growing up in rural Sicily in the 70s and experiencing abuse from pretty much every man she encountered. (Unfortunately I don't think Italian's one of the more studied A level languages)

'Well you can take any piece of literature and analyse it from a feminist perspective. So it doesn't really matter what text you study.'

I don't follow. IMO it's not really ok to accept studying texts that, when analysed from a feminist perspective, give the consistent message that women lie about rape and their being abused or killed isn't really terribly important and certainly not sufficient to merit widespread outrage?

normantebbit
Frankly, whilst it would be fascinating to study Of Mice.... From a feminist lerspective, based on my own experience twenty five years ago and based on what we know about 15 and 16 year olds, it seems unlikely that at GCSE level that a teacher with 30 kids is going to be able to get byond the immediate themes to discuss with appropriate depth the "she asked for it" angle which I imagine comes up pretty readily.