Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"Former student sues LSE over its 'gender bias' against men"

86 replies

NormaStanleyFletcher · 05/09/2011 19:46

here

OP posts:
StewieGriffinsMom · 06/09/2011 11:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ElephantsAndMiasmas · 06/09/2011 13:43

Does no-one else think that he signed up for this course with the intention of taking the university to court? It sounds like exactly the sort of thing the resident MN trolls/MRAs would do.

LRD: "In lots of subjects, women (or men) who want to write about or read about women have to look at the course specifications and find a way to do that." - That is soooo true. I had to bend over backwards to write about women even one week a term.

BobBanana · 06/09/2011 13:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

StewieGriffinsMom · 06/09/2011 14:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ElephantsAndMiasmas · 06/09/2011 14:42

Dittany is right, he's the patriarchy-police basically appointing himself to make sure that there is no niche of academia, however little, where the study of women and what they do is permitted.

CotesduRhone · 06/09/2011 14:42

Yes, that's precisely what I thought. A pox on his douchery if tis so.

NormaStanleyFletcher · 06/09/2011 15:29

Have seen on mra site (found while googling the story to show someone, not somewhere I usually hang out!) That he has run out of dosh for the action and they were suggesting that ppl donate

OP posts:
StewieGriffinsMom · 06/09/2011 15:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheSmallClanger · 06/09/2011 17:01

I could quite believe that he is an MRA who has done this on purpose.

Either that, or an antifeminist queer theorist of some description. I met one of those once. Their reason for existence seems to be to trundle round claiming that they are not being included.

TheCrackFox · 06/09/2011 17:08

Who the hell would donate money????

Very glad that tax payers money isn't being used for his legal fees.

Hardgoing · 06/09/2011 18:28

It's very unlikely that a course on gender and the media would have nothing to say about masculinity and male gender issues, he obviously only got a few weeks in doing the bit about femininity and decided to sue them instead (as you do). He must have done it on purpose.

He was probably one of those students I hate, who try to dominate every discussion and get very annoyed when they lose the conversational floor. It can be a full-time job just trying to get them to be quiet so the others can speak.

Hatwoman · 06/09/2011 18:37

sorry to be thick but what's MRA? wikipedia isn't helping

Hatwoman · 06/09/2011 18:38

men's rights activist?

StewieGriffinsMom · 06/09/2011 19:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

joaninha · 06/09/2011 20:02

So does this mean I can sue all the educational institutions I've attended since I was 5 for boring my pants off with Harolds, Williams and Henrys, the Romans, Egyptians, a whole list of sodding battles and weapons I couldn't give a toss about, and teaching me practically nothing about women's lives in the past?

This reminds me of this guy who told me that the problem with the BBC was that ALL the producers were women. I looked it up. It was about 40%. White men have been used to having it all about them for so long that when the balance is redressed even slightly, it all seems askew to them.

lolatignorantpeople · 19/09/2011 12:41

Although the guy himself may be an idiot, it does not mean he does not have a point. It is extremely clear in today's world that women are seen as victims while men are the victors. I am not saying this isn't true sometimes but definately not on the scale we're made to believe. Worst of all is the fact feminists are 'striving for gender equality' and that the governemt are now using positive discrimination towards women. Any sort of discrimination is wrong yet i find it amusing at how many peopleturn a blind eye when its for women but when its against them they start a furore. Moreover most of you people on this talkboard are just talking for the fun of it and would do most people a favour by keeping quiet.

AyeBelieveInTheHumanityOfMen · 19/09/2011 12:55
KRITIQ · 19/09/2011 12:56

lola, positive discrimination is illegal in the UK, although I am aware that there are programmes like affirmative action in the US. Positive action (e.g. a statement saying "we encourage disabled people to apply because they are underrepresented in our organisation," is something different because the decision in the end is still "open."

The whole reason why there is a need for positive action is to level what is a very uneven playing field. Gender discrimination is institutionalised. It's so much a part of the "fabric" of our lives, political systems, businesses, public institutions, etc., that it's rarely questioned. Men, particularly those holding other privileges say based on class, ethnicity, education, sexuality, etc., are automatically advantaged by the set up.

Your last sentence is really off, imho. Are you trying to say that feminists should not be allowed to discuss issues here? Frankly speaking, if you don't like it, no one is forcing you to read it. Don't let the screen door hit your behind on the way out and all that . . .

MarginallyNarkyPuffin · 19/09/2011 12:58

If you want to know more about who the man is see here. He responds personally in the comments section.

Here is the link to his page on Twitter. Who knew you could fit so much loathing into one page?

aliceliddell · 19/09/2011 13:01

'lola' is very nearly an anagram for 'troll'. I wonder if whatsisname is suing SOAS for inherent race discrimination against white people who aren't Oriental or African? If not, why not? Ooh, let me guess...

MarginallyNarkyPuffin · 19/09/2011 13:03

.

StewieGriffinsMom · 19/09/2011 18:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Anniegetyourgun · 19/09/2011 20:22

It's not "Lola" anything, it's lol at ...

I'm glad he/she did bump the thread though, I hadn't seen it when it was new. Everyone deserves a chance to snigger at the pompous twit with thing up arse.

NormaStanleyFletcher · 16/03/2012 17:52

An update

snigger

OP posts:
SardineQueen · 16/03/2012 18:41

Just staggering.