Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

onscenity network - what they think of mumsnet campaign

59 replies

weeonion · 14/06/2011 16:15

"Being inane, however, does not mean ineffective: these slogans compel our assent, and indeed in the case of Mumsnet, emptiness and circularity are fundamental to reaching its audience. The campaign invites us to be part of a ?we? who know true girlhood, against a despicable ?other? who is at best ignorant and at worst bent on destroying it. Attempt to define what girls are or should do, however, and this cosy conspiracy will soon unravel: some associate girls with piano-playing and horse-riding, as if a privileged middle class existence is attainable and desired by all; feminists are unlikely to warm to the virtues of ?pink tea parties and frilly dresses? extolled by others; and those for whom ?playing with dolls? encapsulates innocuous girlishness presumably airbrush Bratz out of the picture."

hmm - what do you think of this from the blog of Onscenity network www.onscenity.org/sexualization/

a network funded through Arts & Human research council funding.

OP posts:
madwomanintheattic · 15/06/2011 20:38

ok

and never the twain shall meet, etc etc.

i think it's a shame that rad fems have shunned academia. even to the point of refusing to debate, but hey ho. by taking up a standpoint as a deliberate outsider i suppose it prevents any messy discussion over boundaries.

right, gotta grocery shop or we're all starving tonight.

dittany · 15/06/2011 22:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MillyR · 15/06/2011 23:11

This funding should have gone to child psychologists. Surely they are the people who are actually able to give expert advice on what impact sexualisation is going to have.

These media people seem to have been ignored; hopefully it will stay that way.

madwomanintheattic · 15/06/2011 23:48

i was pondering that on the way to the supermarket actually. (the were the rad fems jumped or were they pushed, angle)

but i'd say anyone that persuades the ahrc to give them money and holds the title of professor is what passes for academia currently...

why let it lie though? surely to get the backing of the establishment in that manner by fighting your way back in would be the brave thing to do? the turning the other cheek and ignoring thing is a bit... i dunno... defeatist?

millyr - you would think that child psychology would be at leas tpart of the research... alongside the businesses and professors of sex. (but really)

MillyR · 16/06/2011 00:06

There must be lots of people researching the sexualisation of children in fields like law, child psychology social policy and so on - they perhaps just don't associate with this research group.

Maybe this always happens in Media Studies - the academics spend more time thinking about media and associating with people who work in the media (in this case pornographers) than they spend thinking about the rest of society.

madwomanintheattic · 16/06/2011 00:32

it seems very insular... i don't know anything about media departments really...

(some of) these guys do seem to be working with actual sexual health clinics and stuff though, so there must be some sort of multi-discip thing going on... i'm very confused.

oh well. not an unusual position for me to be in. Grin

dittany · 16/06/2011 09:02

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

madwomanintheattic · 16/06/2011 15:19

better to do it from within, though, eh?

obv not.

dittany · 16/06/2011 16:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread