One of the issues is that the CPS only charge these people with certain of the offences, in order to present a strong case at court. Presumably the other victims whose cases the CPS do not present are reassured that he is going away for life.
And then he's back out after 7 years. And some of the victims know that he was never charged with the offences against them. Same with Worboys. Charged with 19 offences against 12 victims out of offences on what police say is more than 100 women. Sentenced to an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment for public protection. Was approved for release after 10 years.
The other issue is that a lot of the women are deemed unreliable complainants because of a history of substance abuse and mental health problems, so it is hard to even bring a case in the first place. And Mitchell took full advantage of that.
And then the third obstacle is that it is of course it is very hard to convince a jury of violence against women.
At trial, Mitchell was convicted of two rapes, three indecent assaults and six counts of misconduct in a public office. But he was also cleared of three rapes, two indecent assaults and two counts of misconduct.
So Mitchell was only charged with a fraction of his crimes in the first place. And then he was only found guilty of a fraction of the crimes that he was charged with. And then he only served a fraction of the time that his victims thought he would serve.
It is this constant watering down of the severity of these crimes at every single stage that is so horrible.