I've never posted before, but have been lurking for a while, and I've really enjoyed reading this section of MN, so hi everyone...I'm a bit nervous about this, but here goes:
I'm on maternity leave at the moment with my first DS, but talking to my work about going back. Stemming from this, I have some rambling thoughts which I shall doubtless make in a very ineloquent fashion.
Talking to my friends, I would say that it seems as if, although employers are happy for the us to return, there's an acceptance amongst the mums that, (for a few years at least), this will involve having to take on some less interesting work, be willing to take a back seat, not go after promotion, in order to be home in time to pick up the children and to guarantee that that can happen every day. However, we're all going back, not just for financial reasons, but also because we think that to take a longer break to bring up our children makes it increasingly difficult to return to work after several years out. These are decisions women are making.
Equally, if you're part time, or need to leave early to do the nursery run, or work from home regularly, you are more likely to be seen by work as not pulling your weight, and as a result will be more likely to be passed over for promotions, pay rises and good roles. So, the employer's attitude compounds the decisions women have already made. [My thinking here is possibly biased by having worked in the City, where really if you aren't sat at your desk to all hours, you aren't working. Working at home is still seen by many people as an excuse to be slack. And there's also the guilt of the woman, who has to leave her still very young child to go back to work (probably for financial reasons), but may also be made to feel like she's not contributing equally at work either. It may well be different in other areas of work - it would be interesting to hear - but apologies if I've made my experiences sound like they can be generalised to all areas of working life]
Clearly in many professions, the situation is far improved from even 10 years ago, and technology makes working at home so much more straightforward. Also, if you're part time, you are literally only making a % of the contribution that a full time employee is, and I understand that. But I think there's also the future contribution you're making in raising a child who will eventually contribute to the economy themselves, to the benefit of everyone - but women are permanently (see the pay differentials between men and women) disadvantaged for doing so. Maybe this is an acceptable trade-off?
I guess my thinking was that the whole working environment was moulded when it really was just men and so making allowances for women and maternity leave just didn't come into it. This isn't supposed to be a "can we have it all?" question, or a whinge about how difficult it all is. More of a slightly theoretical - should we accept a trade off of having less of a career in order to raise our children, or, if it doesn't really work in the current structures of working life, what does a more "balanced" working world look like? Or, how do we make raising a child an acceptable career choice?
That may not be very coherent at all, but what do you think?