Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

A Tale Of Two Cities, Four Month Read Along. (Title edited by MNHQ at request of OP)

267 replies

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 03/01/2026 11:24

Welcome to a 6 month read along of Dicken’s 12th novel A Tale of Two Cities
We will be reading it using the following format, and discussing the chapters on the first day of the following month: (So January chapters discussed from 1st Feb onwards etc)

A Tale of Two Cities

6-Month Read-Along Calendar

Start: 1 January 2026
Finish: 30 June 2026

🗓️
JANUARY 2026

Book the First: Recalled to Life
(Chapters 1–7)

✔ Book the First complete

🗓️
FEBRUARY 2026

Book the Second: The Golden Thread
(Chapters 1–6)

🗓️
MARCH 2026

Book the Second: The Golden Thread
(Chapters 7–12)

✔ Midway through Book the Second

🗓️
APRIL 2026

Book the Second: The Golden Thread
(Chapters 13–18)

🗓️
MAY 2026

Book the Second: The Golden Thread
(Chapters 19–24)

✔ Book the Second complete

🗓️
JUNE 2026

Book the Third: The Track of a Storm
(Chapters 1–15)

✔ Novel complete

I know very little about this book other than its set in revolutionary Paris and London, let’s hope it’s a goodie!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 28/02/2026 15:50

Getting ready for discussions tomorrow (and trying to space out my spamming of the thread!) here are the three illustrations accompanying Book 2 Chapters 1 - 12:

A Tale Of Two Cities, Four Month Read Along. (Title edited by MNHQ at request of OP)
A Tale Of Two Cities, Four Month Read Along. (Title edited by MNHQ at request of OP)
A Tale Of Two Cities, Four Month Read Along. (Title edited by MNHQ at request of OP)
OP posts:
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 01/03/2026 00:38

Recap and Analysis from Gradesaver Book 2 Chapters 1 to 9

Chapter 1: Five Years Later

The second book opens with a description of the venerable Tellson's Bank. Its darkness and discomfort are much beloved by those who work there. Indeed, their conviction that it should remain inconvenient and deteriorating is so strong that they would have disinherited a son who disagreed with them.

Jerry Cruncher, who delivered the message on horseback to Mr. Lorry, serves as an odd job man for Tellson's. He lives in Whitefriars in a tiny apartment kept immaculate by his wife. He abuses this wife roundly for kneeling to pray, insinuating that her prayers interfere with the success of his business. He enlists the aid of his admiring son to prevent Mrs. Cruncher from praying against him. When she tries to pray, her son reveals her transgression to his father.

The young Cruncher follows his father to work, and he wonders where the rust on the straw his father is chewing comes from. His job at Tellson's does not involve rust, yet Jerry Cruncher is always rusty.

Chapter 2: A Sight

An old clerk at Tellson's gives Jerry Cruncher a message to deliver to Mr. Lorry at Old Bailey, where Charles Darnay is being tried. Jerry makes his way into the trial and is reassured by an onlooker that this is indeed the treason case. The man gruesomely describes the quartering that is certain to follow as punishment. When the young gentleman prisoner, Charles Darnay, is brought in, the whole courtroom stares at him. He had pleaded not guilty the previous day. Darnay's gaze rests immediately on Dr. Manette and his daughter, who are to be witnesses for the prosecution.

Chapter 3: A Disappointment

Charles Darnay is charged with shuttling back and forth between France and England in order to spy. John Barsad, who was his friend, is the chief witness against him. Darnay was allegedly involved in traitorous activities as far back as five years ago, during the outbreak of the American Revolution.

Mr. Lorry is called to give evidence against Charles Darnay, and he identifies Darnay as the man who came on board in the middle of the night at Calais on the way from France to England. Miss Manette is called and, though she identifies him, she strongly regrets that her evidence could bring him any harm. Lucie testifies that the prisoner confided in her that he was traveling under an assumed name on a delicate business. Dr. Manette testifies that he also recognizes the man.

The case is thrown into uproar and made fruitless, however, when a Mr. Carton reveals himself. Carton looks so much like Darnay that a positive identification of the defendant is made impossible. Darnay's defense counsel, Mr. Stryver, shows that Barsad was himself a traitor. The jury deliberates for a long time. Lucie faints and is taken out of the courthouse. Mr. Lorry tells Jerry to remain to take the verdict to Tellson's. Jerry receives a piece of paper on which it is written that Darnay is acquitted.

Chapter 4: Congratulatory

Dr. Manette, Lucie, Mr. Lorry, the solicitor for the defense, and Mr. Stryver all congratulate Darnay on his escape from death. Dr. Manette's face is clouded over by the negative emotions caused by being cross-examined about being imprisoned. The Manettes depart in a hackney-coach, and a slightly drunk Mr. Carton asks to be allowed to speak to Mr. Darnay. They dine in a tavern, and Mr. Carton proposes a toast to Miss Manette. After Darnay leaves, Mr. Carton looks at himself in a mirror and reflects that he does not like Darnay because he too much resembles what Carton himself could have been, had Carton not been so dissolute. He hates Darnay for inspiring Miss Manette to look at him with such compassion.

Chapter 5: The Jackal

Mr. Stryver is prone to alcoholism, and he is a drinking companion of Mr. Carton's--they had been fellow students in Paris. Mr. Stryver, despite all of his capacity to push himself ahead, became a much more successful lawyer when Mr. Carton began working on and helping summarize his documents for him. Thus Carton became Stryver's jackal. When Stryver talks about how pretty Miss Manette is, Carton denies it, claiming she is nothing but a blond "doll." Carton leaves Stryver's house and returns to his own, crying himself to sleep. He is haunted by the honorable glories that once were available to him but are now out of his reach.

Chapter 6: Hundreds of People

Four months after the trial, Mr. Lorry dines with the Manettes. The Manettes live in Soho, a charming part of London not yet fully urbanized. Dr. Manette has revived his medical practice out of the house and lives comfortably. He converses with Miss Pross, who is upset because, as she terms it, hundreds of people come looking for Miss Manette (whom she calls "my Ladybird") although Miss Pross thinks they do not deserve her. Mr. Lorry recognizes Miss Pross's devotion and values her more highly than wealthier women who have balances at Tellson's. He questions Miss Pross about whether Dr. Manette knows the identity of the person who caused him to be jailed for so long; she thinks he does. When Lucie and her father arrive, Miss Pross fusses over the girl, arranging her bonnet and smoothing her hair. Miss Pross had scoured the neighborhood for French expatriates to teach her cooking tricks, and she is now considered a sorceress in the kitchen. After dinner, Mr. Darnay comes to call. Dr. Manette is in good humor until he gets flustered when Darnay tells a story about the Tower of London, in which many prisoners' initials were carved. The only ones that couldn't be matched by a former prisoner were D.I.G., which the guards figured was an imperative to dig (they dug, but found only remains of a possible letter).

Mr. Carton joins the party as it moves inside out of a rainstorm. Lucy tells of her fancy that the footsteps that echo outside her house are the footsteps of people to come in and out of her life. Mr. Carton observes that this vision represents a great number of people who really will be in her life.

Chapter 7: Monseigneur in Town

Monseigneur is a powerful lord of France who holds receptions every two weeks in his hotel in Paris. It takes four men to muster the ceremony necessary to serve him his morning chocolate. His idea of general public business is to let things go their own way, and his idea of specific public business is for things to go whatever way is most profitable for him. Monseigneur found that these principles, in addition to the reduction of his finances, made it advantageous for him to ally himself with a Farmer-General by marrying his sister to one. Everyone in his court is unreal because none knows how to do a lick of work that is useful to anyone else. The Marquis de Evremonde, also known as Monseigneur, condemns him as he leaves, and then rides away in his own carriage.

Monseigneur's carriage, driving recklessly fast, runs down and kills a child. The Marquis gives Gaspard, the child's father, a gold coin, and gives Defarge another gold coin for making the philosophical observation that the child is better off dead. As the Marquis is driving away, Defarge throws the coin back at the carriage. Upper-class people continue to drive through Saint Antoine as the poor and hungry look on.

Chapter 8: Monseigneur in the Country

The Marquis continues driving in his carriage through another poor village, this one made destitute by over-taxation. He stops and demands to speak with one of the villagers, asking him why he stared so intently as the Marquis drove up the hill. The man replies that there was a man under the carriage hanging from the shoe. He describes the man as white as a miller and tall as a ghost. The villager claims that when the carriage stopped, the man underneath dived headfirst over the hillside. The Marquis loses patience with the story and asks Monsieur Gabelle, the Postmaster, to put the villagers out of his sight. The Marquis sets off again but is waylaid by a woman with a petition. Her husband has died and she wishes for a piece of wood or stone to mark his grave; too many have died and become heaps of unmarked earth. He pushes away from her without replying and continues the journey to his château. When he arrives he asks if Monsieur Charles has yet arrived from England.

Chapter 9: The Gorgon's Head

The Chateau is all stone, as if a Gorgon's head had looked at it. Monseigneur sits down to dinner after complaining that his nephew has not yet arrived. When Charles Darnay does arrive, Monseigneur observes that he has taken a long time coming from London. Darnay accuses Monseigneur of an effort to have him imprisoned in France with a letter de cachet. Monseigneur does not deny this, but he complains about the inaccessibility of such measures and the privileges that the aristocracy has lost. He considers repression to be the only effective and lasting policy; Darnay replies that their family has done wrong and will pay the consequences. Darnay renounces his property and France. Monseigneur mocks him for having not been more successful in England, then mentions the doctor and his daughter but ominously refuses to say more.

Owls howl through the night, and when the sun rises its slanting angle makes the Chateau fountain seem full of blood. The villagers wake up first to start their toil, and the occupants of the Chateau awake later, but when they do arise, they engage in frenzied activity. Monseigneur was murdered during the night. There is a knife through his heart, containing a piece of paper on which it is written: "Drive him fast to his tomb. This, from Jacques."

Analysis

As in Shakespearean tragedies, the great elements of tragedy are provided by the upper classes, while the lower classes provide comic relief, often by the distinct color and topics of their language. In Chapter 1, the Cruncher family provides comic relief from the heavy sentimentality of the reuniting of the Manettes. Jerry Cruncher uses laughably vivid language to censure his wife's sense of religion: "You're a nice woman! What do you mean by flopping yourself down and praying agin me?" There is humor in the fact that Jerry objects to the very characteristics that actually make his wife nice. For a man who claims not to believe in religion, Jerry has a very real fear of the success of prayer, believing that he has been "religiously circumwented into the worst of luck."

Physical appearance and names continue to be accurate indicators of the conditions of the humans they belong to. Despite Jerry's favorite appellation of himself as an "honest tradesman," the details illustrate that the opposite is more likely the case. The last name of Cruncher is illustrative of the morbid nature of his job, which is echoed by the younger Cruncher's hobby of "inflicting bodily and mental injuries of an acute description" on boys younger and weaker than himself on Fleet Street.

The boy is a physical double; he is destined to develop into his father. He wears a slightly less dangerous version of the spikes that adorn his father's head. These spikes, which an earlier chapter described as making him an undesirable player of leapfrog, are portrayed as more hazardous in this chapter; they might "tear his sheets to ribbons." The father and son are also united in their resemblance to animals, looking like a pair of monkeys as they absently survey Fleet Street.

Also in Chapter 1, Dickens drops more clues to foreshadow the unsavory nature of Jerry Cruncher's real business. One as yet inexplicable detail is the rustiness that surrounds Jerry. Others include the fact that while he returns home from Tellson's with clean boots, he wakes up in the morning to a set of muddy boots.

Like France, England has its prisons that admit young men and release old men. In England, the prisons are transformed into "acceptable" social structures. Tellson's Bank serves as one of these prisons. It has very elderly clerks who have committed themselves to service, or kept themselves "in a dark place" since their youth. It has a "condemmed hold" for those who need to visit the House. Everything in Tellson's points towards death and decay: the letters and deeds are decaying from being kept for so long. The Bank is also down the street from the Temple Bar Courts, which send several people to gruesome deaths everyday.

Old Bailey is described in Chapter 2 as a perfect example of the precept, "Whatever is is right," a direct quotation from Alexander Pope, an eighteenth- century satirist. The phrase is the last line of the first Epistle of his Essay on Man, which Pope wrote to laud man's abilities and the great possibilities of his relationship with God. The first Epistle is mainly concerned with theodicy, that is, explaining why a perfect God would allow suffering in a world of his own creation.

The French philosopher Voltaire challenged the optimism of "whatever is is right" in his satire Candide. In his own way, consistent with his self-image as a social crusader, Dickens also finds this optimism unlikely. It seems unforgivable that Old Bailey is allowed to continue in its abuses, despite the fact that it has handed down incorrect and probably unjust sentences.

Trials, like the famous madhouse named Bedlam, not only were designed to deal with criminals and the insane, but they also served as entertainment for the general public. Families would go on outings to Old Bailey to jeer at criminals. Dickens strongly critiques this excessive interest in human suffering, illustrating that the only reason for the interest in Mr. Darnay's person is the possibility of his severe sentence. Dickens condemns this monstrous interest in viewing a body that is later to be mangled as "at the root of it, Ogreish."

Dickens also presents another version of the Paris mobs - in this case, it becomes the English crowd at the courts. Dickens thus presents a foreshadowing of future events: the mob, hungry for blood, eagerly watches a man who is under the threat of death.

The accused man's name is Charles Darnay. Observant readers will notice that the CD of Darnay's initials are also the initials for Charles Dickens. Some scholars suggest that Darnay is an idealized version of Dickens. Darnay is clearly an idealized man, with his handsome looks and calm demeanor. However, he is placed under a mirror on the stand, and he looks into it. Dickens uses the mirror to suggest that Darnay will be presented with a mirror image of himself - an image we will see in chapter 3.

Darnay's acquittal in Chapter 3 is the second example of resurrection in the novel. His conviction is almost certain before the appearance of Mr. Carton, and this is what has brought out the crowd. Dickens compares the onlookers to blueflies, noting their buzz after any piece of evidence in Darnay's disfavor is disclosed. The title of the chapter refers to the crowd's disappointment when there is no blood for them to see, and the final image of the chapter is of the masses buzzing Old Bailey in search of other carrion to feed on.

Dickens included frequent biblical references, and these would have been very familiar to the audience of his day. In Chapter 2, he depicts the mirror that hangs over the bar as having recorded innumerable criminal faces. He reflects on how haunted Old Bailey would be if the mirror would give up its previous reflections, "as the ocean is one day to give up its dead." Dickens alludes here to Revelations 20:13--"And the sea gave up the dead that were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works."

A more obvious biblical reference is the portrayal of Barsad by the defense lawyer as "one of the greatest scoundrels upon the earth since accursed Judas-which he certainly did look rather like." This is, of course, a reference to Judas Iscariot, the apostle who betrayed Jesus in return for money. The assertion that he looks like Judas is absurd, because there is no record of how Judas looked, but it is representative of the wild accusations and poetic license used in courts of the day. Barsad's characterization as Judas highlights the thematic connection of Darnay's acquittal with Jesus's resurrection.

Dickens presents Sydney Carton as a lowly clerk. However, he is actually a powerful man. His power is a covert power that stems from his powers of observation. After all, he is the first one to see Darnay's resemblance to him, and he calls for help for the fainting Lucie, who is ignored by the crowd. Carton's observations will become a force later in the book, especially when his resemblance to Darnay holds importance again.

In Chapter 4 we learn that in Book II ("The Golden Thread"), the golden thread most obviously refers to Lucie's hair. It also refers more abstractly to her curative power over her father. She commands the golden thread because she connects him to an earlier time that was not painful and to a present beyond his miserable period of imprisonment. Lucie is important not only for her golden nature, which has the power to redeem him, but also for the connective nature of her existence. She is the only person able to pull her father away from recollecting his time of misery.
The conversation between Carton and Darnay reintroduces the theme of doubles. Although their facial features are the same, Carton's dissolute behavior marks their difference. This behavior is observable in his unkempt, "debauched" appearance. Another set of doubles is Lucie and her father. They have many of the same facial characteristics, most notably the habit of knitting their foreheads up, but their different experiences have left the Doctor's face almost unrecognizably marked with cares, while Lucie's face is still fresh and fair. As a social crusader, Dickens was preoccupied with the way that debauched or unhealthy environments could corrupt even good people, and the presence of doubles in his novel illustrates how the same characteristics might grow in different ways in response to different environments.
Dickens reveals Darnay to be the ideal romantic hero - a man who is swayed by love, and a gallant gentleman. Lucie's memory of his actions five years ago and her worry over him are more important than her near-destruction of his life, so he acknowledges her with a polite kiss on the hand. Carton, with his rude manners, sharp tongue, and drinking habits, serves as a darker version of Darnay. Carton, like Darnay, is forced to look into a mirror and to confront this opposite version of himself. If these men are supposed to be the two sides of Dickens, Carton is the new, sinister side that writes darker books and leaves his wife, while Darnay is the former young, idealistic writer.
Chapter 5 is primarily concerned with establishing Sydney Carton's admiration for Lucie Manette and his self-loathing in the knowledge that he has done nothing in his life worthy of her admiration - or anyone's admiration, for that matter. His love for Miss Manette and his self-hatred generate motives that will be crucial later on.
Despite the presentation of Carton as debauched, Dickens exercises the sentiments of his readers to garner some sympathy for Carton. His propensity to shoot himself in the foot is traced back to primary school, where he did other boys' work rather than his own. The responsibility for his own lack of success is placed somewhat on Stryver, who was born with more advantages than Carton. The chapter ends with the pathetic image of the sun rising sadly. Carton's state is pitiable enough to draw an emotional response even from nature herself, or at least that is how it seems from Carton's perspective.
Stryver calls Carton "Memory" in this chapter. The nickname echoes the theme of time. It implies that Carton has the ability to transcend time - he can move well in the past and the present because of his power to remember things.
The description of the Manettes' Soho home, which opens Chapter 6, is in strong opposition to the description of the Defarges' dwelling in Paris. All of the misery, filth, and want which are apparent in Paris are nowhere to be seen in this charming rural suburb. If Doctor Manette has something in common with the French underclass, this is not it. Nature is allowed to function uninterrupted here, and its fruits are seen in beautiful hawthorn and peach trees. Class struggle is clearly not a possibility in this part of London, or at least it is not an issue for the Manettes.
"Hundreds of People," the humorous title of Chapter 6, is derived from Miss Pross's exaggeration of the number of Lucie's admirers. Miss Pross has great concern for her "Ladybird." This concern seems excessive, especially since Lucie has just three suitors at the most. This chapter develops more fully the character of Miss Pross, who up to this point has only been seen in a forceful and somewhat masculine light. Her character is referred to as "a Sorceress, or Cinderella's godmother," alluding to her transformative power over food.
The running joke of the chapter is that Mr. Lorry continuously recalls Miss Pross's phrase, "hundreds of people." Throughout the evening he notes that they still have not turned up; only Carton and Darnay are visiting. The phrase is somewhat justified, however, in that Lucie fancies that the people walking outside will eventually walk into her life - this would indeed include hundreds of people.
The main theme of Chapter 7 is the uselessness and absurdity of the pre-Revolutionary French upper class. Although they consider the world to be in order so long as everyone is dressed correctly as for a fancy ball, their position is unsustainable because none of them performs any useful jobs. The military men know nothing about war, the religious men are lascivious, and the doctors cure only imaginary diseases.
The corruption of the upper class is conveyed through the ironic religious language used to describe Monseigneur. His personal room is called the "Holiest of Holies," a direct translation from the Latin sanctum sanctorum and ultimately from the Hebrew Bible, referring to the especially sacred inner chamber of a temple. As for his philosophy of personal gain: "the text of his order (altered from the original by only a pronoun, which is not much) ran: 'The earth and the fullness thereof are mine, saith Monseigneur.'" The altered pronoun is the substitution of "Monseigneur," for "Lord," the irony being that Monseigneur does not consider the exchange a very considerable alteration. The substitution is a pun in French, because "Monseigneur" literally translates as "my Lord," so the biblical address ("my Lord" referring to God) and the feudal address ("my Lord" as a reference to an aristocrat or a superior) are perhaps not as distant as the two beings themselves really are. The line between religion and political hierarchy is further blurred by the extent to which his servants kowtow to Monseigneur. Their excessive adulation seems to violate the first commandment, that "thou shalt have no other gods but me." Monseigneur's contempt for religion is further demonstrated by his valuation of the nun's veil as the "cheapest garment she could wear," having no appreciation for her intentional humility, when he resolves to sell her into marriage for more.
Monseigneur is the French counterpart to Miss Pross' benevolent magic. He literally weaves a spell over the nobles, who obey his every whim. He is portrayed as the leader of a pagan sect, who is spirited away by little sprites. His followers engage in all sorts of pagan practices, from Convulsionists, who have fits, to those who follow "Truth" and ignore faith completely.
A Farmer-General was a type of French tax collector whose job was to "farm" the taxes of a particular district at his discretion. Such collectors were notorious for ripping off their struggling neighbors by collecting even steeper taxes than what they were required to send to the monarch, then pocketing the difference. The Farmer-General is an extremely wealthy man described as carrying "an appropriate cane with a golden apple on top of it." The cane is appropriate in the sense that the Farmer-General is not really a farmer, but merely collects money. His harvest is made of gold.
It is important to note that the child is crushed near the fountain in the center of the square. The themes of water and fountains become important throughout the novel as well. The fountain that sees the child's death does not have the power to cleanse and purify. From this death, all fountains will become places of death. In lieu of the purifying fountains, the mob itself will resemble a large sea. In turn, this new water will replace these fountains with fountains of blood.
In Chapter 8, en route from Paris to his country house, the Marquis is put into direct contact with the poor people whom he wants nothing to do with. Consistent with the negative images of the French aristocracy in this novel, the Marquis is brutally contemptuous of the plight of the lower class. He is willing to stop his carriage not in response to poverty and want, but only when he thinks that the class hierarchy is being breached. The trouble is that a lower-class man is staring at the carriage instead of showing respect. The Marquis shows his contempt for the villagers by calling them "pig" and "dolt."
Dickens uses an illusion to classical mythology to illustrate how frightful the appearance of the coach was to the lower classes. He describes the "cracking of his postilions' whip which twined snakelike about their heads in the evening air, as if he came attended by the Furies..." The Furies were ancient Greek goddesses usually represented with snakes twined in their hair, sent to avenge wrong and punish crime. The irony is, of course, that the Marquis's assumed role is to perpetuate, rather than to avenge, wrong, although the Marquis probably would claim that the poor morally deserve their poverty. The religious undertones of his power are reinforced by the image of him being waited on by goddesses.
Although Dickens consistently writes in English, the French language is extremely important to those chapters that he sets in France. For example, the Postmaster's name, Gabelle, who is also "some other taxing functionary," is a direct reflection of his occupation. "Gabelle" was formerly the general name for taxation, but it became associated right before the Revolution with a particularly oppressive salt tax. Hence, the Gabelle's name evokes the most infamously unjust pre-Revolutionary tax. Dickens peppers his text with other French words, such as "flambeau," to describe the lighting of the chateau. Most noticeably, the names of the French aristocracy are given either in French or in direct translation. For example, Monsieur the Marquis, which does not make sense in English, is a direct translation of Monsieur le Marquis.
The dramatic cliffhanger in Chapter 8 is that Monsieur Charles of England almost certainly refers to Charles Darnay. Is possible that Charles is associated with this terrible man?
The title of Chapter 9 refers again to Greek mythology. A Gorgon was a woman with hair made of snakes and whose gaze turned the beholder into stone. The most famous Gorgon was Medusa. The identification of a Gorgon's gaze with Monseigneur's house is apt, highlighting the viciousness of the ancient regime (the name for the "old rule" of the monarch and aristocrats in feudal France).
The murder of Monseigneur is the first event in the great class struggle that erupts in the text. Details of the furnishings of the chateau also hint at the character of the family who own it, and they give further justification (beyond Monseigneur's personal brutality) for his murder. His furniture, "diversified by many objects that were illustrations of old pages in the history of France," is mainly in the style of Louis XIV, the so called "sun-god" who ruled France from 1643 to 1715. The style is highly decorative, and at the time in which the novel is set, it is somewhat out of date. This opulence, in combination with even older furnishings, not only displays Monseigneur's wealth but also illustrates that his disregard of the common people is not particular to him; his fortune has been entrenched in his family for many generations and has its roots in feudalism.
The irony in the description of the chateau as solid, stony, and rooted in history is that Dickens portends that it will be destroyed in the French Revolution. (See the passage, "If a picture of the chateau as it was to be a very few years hence... [Monseigneur] might have been at a loss to claim this own from the ghastly, fire-charred, plunder-wrecked ruins.") Because Dickens did not witness the French Revolution firsthand, his primary reference on the period was Thomas Carlyle's The French Revolution, as he acknowledges in his preface. Carlyle's book includes a chapter on the destruction of aristocrats' chateaux in the period following the storming of the Bastille.
The passage foreseeing the destruction of the chateau also serves to foreshadow the actual vulnerability of the seemingly impregnable Monseigneur himself. Further foreshadowing of Monseigneur's death can be traced to the hooting of the owls on the night of his death. This is an allusion to Shakespeare's Macbeth on the night when King Duncan is killed. Macbeth says, "I have done the deed. Didst thou not hear a noise?" and Lady Macbethreplies, "I heard the owl scream and the crickets cry" (II.ii.14-15). Popular superstition in the 19th century held that an owl screaming was a harbinger of death.
Darnay serves as another mirror for his uncle in this chapter. We learn that his father and the Marquis were actually twins, mirror images of each other. In that time, both brothers reflected the corrupt habits of the nobility off each other. Darnay is the flipped image of his uncle. Instead of being a corrupt nobleman, he wants to renounce his title completely; instead of repressing the people, he wants to help them.

OP posts:
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 01/03/2026 00:41

A Tale of Two Cities Summary and Analysis of Book II, Chapters 10-12

Chapter 10: Two Promises

A year later, Charles Darnay is back in England, happily working as a tutor of French. He has been in love with Lucie since he met her, and he finally asks her father for permission to make his feelings known to her. Despite Dr. Manette's hesitations, Darnay convinces him that his intentions are honorable and sincere. He does not wish to come between Lucie and her father; he wishes, if possible, to bind them closer.

There is always a touch of reserve in Dr. Manette's reception of Darnay, and this struggle is evident in his expression of dread, and although he gives his blessing to Darnay, something is not quite right. Darnay tells the doctor that he is using an assumed name and tries to tell him why he is in England and what his real name is, but the doctor stops him. He says that if Charles does marry Lucie, he should tell him these secrets on the marriage morning. When Lucie returns to the house that night, she hears him working on his shoemaking again for the first time since Paris and is very distressed. She knocks on his door and he stops.

Chapter 11: A Companion Picture

Mr. Stryver and Mr. Carton are drinking together while the latter prepares the former's legal papers. Mr. Stryver, after claiming that his own gallantry is superior to his friend's, announces that he intends to marry Lucie Manette. This causes Carton to drink his punch more rapidly although he claims to have no objections. Stryver feels that he is doing Lucie a good turn and marvels at his own economic disinterestedness in his choice. Stryver recommends that Carton find a woman with some money or property and marry her.

Chapter 12: The Fellow of Delicacy

On his way to Lucie's house in Soho to declare his intentions, Mr. Stryver passes Tellson's and decides to step inside to ask Mr. Lorry's opinion of the matter. Mr. Lorry expresses some politic confusion, and Stryver asks what could possibly be wrong with his proposal. After all, he is eligible, prosperous, and advancing. He considers that if Lucie recognized these qualities and turned him down, she would be a fool.

Despite the fact that he is at Tellson's and must act properly, Mr. Lorry grows angry at this disparagement of Lucie. Mr. Lorry suggests that because it might be painful for Stryver, the doctor, and Lucie if the former were to make an unwelcome suit, perhaps Lorry himself should go to Soho and feel out the subject. Mr. Stryver agrees.

When Mr. Lorry arrives at Stryver's house later that evening with a confirmation that a proposal would be unwelcome, he gets a strange response from the would-be suitor. Stryver pretends to have forgotten the subject. When he is reminded, he professes to be sorry for both the doctor and Mr. Lorry, insinuating that Lucie has gotten herself into trouble and is no longer fit to be engaged. Lorry is so surprised that he merely leaves.

OP posts:
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 01/03/2026 10:49

Some Random Thoughts!

Those that haven’t read the book before what do you think Jerry Cruncher is up to at night with the mysteriously muddy boots and rusty fingers? I’m clueless.

Can’t help but feel the likeness between Darnay and Carton is going to come in useful for more than Charles’s escape from a fate worse than death at the hands of an English Court.

I was finding Chapter 7 very ‘Dickensian’ shall we say with the intricate details of Monseigneur with his hot chocolate and fancy parties.
(I did think he was high up in the church thanks to the ‘sanctuary of sanctuaries holiest of holies’ line, so I’m glad I’ve got Gradesaver to explain the imagery!) The plot picked up once we were mowing down peasants with the devil incarnate!

The Marquis was an absolute Pantomime villain wasn’t he? - no light or shade there, and no loss to the gene pool now he’s gone.

Didn't see the link between the Marquis and Charles Darney coming. Possibly because Darney has seemed so thoroughly English up till now.

It fair tickled me that Darney goes to ask Dr Manette if he may propose to Lucy at some later date and prepares to unburden himself of his deepest secrets only for the Doctor to insist Charles keep schtum and tell him this vital
information on his wedding day should he be fortunate enough to win Lucy’s hand!

What if this withheld information makes Darney an unsuitable or unworthy groom for Manette’s precious daughter, and what a ridiculous plot device.

Lucky old Lucy, not one but two suitors, Stryker is going to propose against his better judgement and despite her straightened circumstances.
Poor Carton will be drinking himself to death at this rate!

OP posts:
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 01/03/2026 11:13

At least Mr Lorry was able to head Stryver off at the pass. Although I did find it odd that Dickens doesn’t allow his readers to be party to the meeting between the Manettes and Lorry to discuss Stryver’s proposal. We only hear of it second hand whilst Stryver is blustering about it being all for the best for him but a tragedy for Lucy who will live to regret her poor life choices!

A Tale Of Two Cities, Four Month Read Along. (Title edited by MNHQ at request of OP)
OP posts:
FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 01/03/2026 12:22

Thank you, @DesdamonasHandkerchief
The analysis is always so interesting.

I hadn't thought of the mirror imagery and that Darnay and Carton represented different aspects of Dickens. And the parallel between the crowd at the court and later on in the book, the French mob, is very apt as they both bay for blood.

I didn't like Jerry Cruncher and his bullying ways and didn't find it humorous in the least. His poor wife! As for his mysterious nocturnal activities, all will be revealed ;)

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 01/03/2026 13:37

I’m thinking something to do with the scrap metal industry maybe 🤔

OP posts:
cassandre · 01/03/2026 15:38

Thanks @DesdamonasHandkerchief ! Wow, the gradesaver analysis is very detailed, and full of interesting points.

I enjoyed this section with its introduction of the Charles Darnay and Sydney Carton characters. I agree with you @FuzzyCaoraDhubh , I don't find Jerry Cruncher comical either (though his injunctions to his poor wife to stop praying are humorous I suppose in a dark ironic kind of way).

I thought the trial scene was very well done. I liked Gradesaver's point about Sydney Carton's watchfulness and powers of observation. I also love the idea of Carton as Darnay's dark double - very gothic.

It's hard to imagine Soho as ever having been a haven of tranquility!

Lucy's fancy about the hundreds of footsteps is very striking. It's another example of crowd imagery I suppose, along with the crowd at the trial and the Revolutionary French mob to come.

I agree that the Marquis is a pantomime villain, Desdamona, but I suspect the callousness of his attitude toward the common people does contain some truth in it, when you consider the aristocracy of the time. The scene with the death of the child was dreadful. Darnay doesn't hold back when it comes to criticising the family estate: To the eye it is fair enough, here; but seen in its integrity, under the sky and by the daylight, it is a crumbling tower of waste, mismanagement, extortion, debt, mortgage, oppression, hunger, nakedness, and suffering. OK then!

Who was the spooky whitefaced man hanging from the Marquis' carriage, I wonder? Apart from maybe prefiguring the Gorgon (another figure with a spectral gaze).

I was amused by all the servants who wait on the Marquis. It reminds me of how Louis XIV in the 17th century had a whole company of noblemen gathered round his bed every morning to wait on him at Versailles. This was the levee or lever (ceremony of rising). Every person had a special task, and being allowed to perform these tasks was an indication of great privilege. One lucky nobleman even got to remove the king's chamber pot. I suspect the Marquis is behaving like a mini king here. Personally I can't imagine anything worse than waking up to a bedroom full of people, but that's just me.

I like the detail of Darnay working as a French tutor. A certain portion of his time was passed at Cambridge, where he read with undergraduates as a sort of tolerated smuggler who drove a contraband trade in European languages, instead of conveying Greek and Latin through the Custom-house. Ha! It's true that modern languages weren't considered a proper subject at Oxbridge for a long time. Nor was English literature for that matter! Classics dominated everything.

No idea what the rusty fingers are about, but I'm sure Cruncher's up to no good!

cassandre · 01/03/2026 15:41

The wikipedia page about levees is interesting, and has a lot of info about Louis XIV's lever if you scroll down (again, I know he lived in the 17th c and not the 18th, but I suspect the custom might have persisted in some form with later monarchs).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levee_(ceremony)

Levee (ceremony) - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levee_(ceremony)

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 01/03/2026 16:52

The Schmoop review of Book 2 Chapter 6 has this to say amongst other things:

▪️ Doctor Manette’s practice is on the ground floor of their home; they live on the second floor.

▪️ A mysterious man whom nobody has ever seen lives on the third floor. Don’t worry—he’s not important. (We're making a joke here by sarcastically rejecting the obvious. We know that if Dickens took the time to describe a mysterious man, there's probably an important reason for it.)

Have to say that completely passed me by as it’s a throw away line in the text:

The Doctor occupied two floors of a large stiff house,…..a lonely lodger rumoured to live up-stairs

I’m sure as with Cruncher’s nefarious anctivies all will become apparent in the fullness of time!

OP posts:
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 01/03/2026 16:59

@cassandre isn't it the case that even now Oxbridge Eng Lit courses are heavy on old English/medieval literature? Beowulf, Chaucer etc. Or is my perception outdated!

OP posts:
cassandre · 01/03/2026 17:19

Ha, I'm not sure of the exact requirements! I'm sure things have changed in that students have a wide choice of different authors/periods/genre to study, and 20th/21st century literature would be among the options. But there is probably a requirement to spread your choices across the centuries, and do at least one pre-modern option (if not more). That said everyone should study medieval literature anyway because it's so amazing 😂

I'm pretty sure that if you read Italian at Oxford, the Dante module is compulsory!

cassandre · 01/03/2026 17:21

The Oxford English professor John Carey wrote in his autobiography that when he came to Oxford to read English as an undergrad in the 1950s, the syllabus stopped at 1832. So even Dickens would have been too daringly modern to be included in the syllabus. That has definitely changed!

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 01/03/2026 19:46

Ha ha @cassandre that’s exactly the sort of quote I heard, maybe the very same one!

OP posts:
BestIsWest · 01/03/2026 19:59

Sounds like my A level syllabus. The most modern thing we studied was Keats’ Odes.

LadybirdDaphne · 01/03/2026 21:26

Raced through this segment, it’s very readable and page-turnery compared to other Dickens. I think the plot is more straightforward without such a massive cast of daftly named characters, which helps. Of course there are some daft names (I see you Cruncher - I do have an inkling of what he’s up to, given notorious criminal doings of the times). Some nominative determinism too with the ever pushing himself forward ‘Stryver’.

Sydney Carton is a nicely nuanced character - not malicious, but a sensitive intelligent young man who hasn’t lived up to his potential and has fallen into less than ideal company.

ChessieFL · 02/03/2026 10:22

I’m slightly behind as I still have 3 chapters to go, but I am really enjoying this.

Re Cruncher and his rusty hands, I wasn’t sure if it’s literal rust or if it’s actually blood? Or am I reading too much into the other blood themes of the novel and it is just rust?

SydneyCarton · 02/03/2026 11:02

@LadybirdDaphne I remember a joke about Dickens (possibly by the Mary Whitehouse Experience??) giving away plots by calling his characters things like Mrs Lovely, and Mr Complete Bastard, and how if he'd written Cluedo there would be someone called Mr MurdererInTheKitchenWithTheLeadPiping Grin

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 02/03/2026 11:39

Hilarious @SydneyCarton particularly as it’s too near the truth.

OP posts:
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 02/03/2026 11:47

ChessieFL · 02/03/2026 10:22

I’m slightly behind as I still have 3 chapters to go, but I am really enjoying this.

Re Cruncher and his rusty hands, I wasn’t sure if it’s literal rust or if it’s actually blood? Or am I reading too much into the other blood themes of the novel and it is just rust?

Well I’m wondering now if he’s a grave robber after a clue up thread from Ladybird - although I would imagine corpses would be pretty bloodless generally - but I don’t suppose Dickens would let a little thing like facts get in the way of some good imagery 🤔

OP posts:
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 02/03/2026 12:52

And having started March’s chapters I didn’t have to wait long for confirmation as all is revealed in Chapter 14!

OP posts:
TimeforaGandT · 02/03/2026 19:09

Thank you @DesdamonasHandkerchief for keeping me on track and providing the summaries and analysis.

Although I did read this years ago, I have absolutely no recollection of any of the plot so waiting to see how it all unfolds.

I too dislike Cruncher's attitude towards his wife but am a little sympathetic towards him otherwise as he seems to have to hang around in the hope of being needed for messages - does he only get paid if he actually carries a message or does he get paid a wage?

I feel Sydney Carton has a lot of unfulfilled potential which has been exploited by Stryver, who I really dislike. Sydney is the brains whilst Stryver is only the frontman.

Am I going to be disappointed in Charles? Totally agree that I would want to know now who he really is, not on the morning of the wedding (if there is one).

Very readable!

SydneyCarton · 03/03/2026 06:55

I think Jerry only gets paid when there’s a message, but he has another more profitable side hustle which is the main cause of Mrs Cruncher’s worrying and praying. The side hustle also proves to be a source of information which comes in handy later on (if that’s not too much of a spoiler).

TimeforaGandT · 03/03/2026 07:14

Thank you @SydneyCarton - that makes sense with the muddy boots and rusty fingers. Still feel a bit sorry for the fact he hangs around all day in the off chance of a message and some money.

Benvenuto · 03/03/2026 08:27

cassandre · 25/02/2026 21:40

Hello all, I'm just catching up on the thread again before I return to the book to read the February chapters. Welcome to @WearyAuldWumman and @SydneyCarton !

@Benvenuto your post from the beginning of the month (sorry this reply is so late) is very interesting. I confess I'm amazed that someone could prefer Hugo to Dickens. I'm team Dickens, definitely 😂Hugo (to the best of my memory anyway) can be cloyingly sentimental and a bit bombastic at times. Dickens IMO is much more versatile. Yes, he can be painfully sentimental as well, but he can also do sharp satire and comedy. He is hilarious and witty in a way I don't think Hugo can be. That said, I haven't read Hugo in a long time; I want to catch up with the Les Miz readalong (on which I'm VERY behind) and give Hugo a second chance!

I was also intrigued when you said, I’m wondering how Dickens will portray the Revolution when it happens, but judging from the & the mob, I’m guessing he won’t be on the side of the Revolutionaries.

I'm also keen to discover Dickens' take on the Revolution. Judging from Ch 1, he's no defender of the status quo. Take for instance that story he tells about the young man who was gruesomely tortured and killed for not kneeling down to a procession of passing monks: stories of injustice like this would later inspire the French revolutionaries. I suspect that Dickens would have been well aware both of the atrocities perpetrated under the French monarchy, AND of those later carried out by the revolutionaries. I'm looking forward to find out more, however!

I still haven’t changed my opinion re Hugo v Dickens - not least because Lucie is idealised rather than a more realised character. The class point that @DesdamonasHandkerchiefmakes (upper classes for tragedy; lower classes for comic relief) is also in Hugo’s favour.

That said, there is lots of interest in this book. Judging by Monseigneur, Dickens also isn’t on the side of the aristocrats re the Revolution. Monseigneur might be exaggerated for dramatic effect, but he does capture the idle lifestyle & power of pre-Revolutionary aristocrats. I’ve been listening to an audiobook of Les Liaisons Dangereuses and what has really struck me is how little the characters seem to do (all the work is done by those working-class characters who aren’t worthy enough for a tragedy - Valmont even refers to one of them as a comic valet from a play).

I was also really struck by how extensively Dickens described Carton’s drinking - that is quite something for a Victorian novel.