I think society has changed so much, in terms of what women are “allowed” to do, that sometimes we forget that it’s not so long ago that women were not generally expected to have a job outside the home, much less to own a business or hold political office. Anything written NOW has a different slant, maybe a revisionist slant, in comparison to what was written THEN. So I’m mentioning two for anyone who is curious.
The Job is by Nobelist Sinclair Lewis, an early novel before he became famous. It’s a simple story about a young woman who feels stifled in her home town in the 1920s, with no attractive marital prospects, so when her father suddenly dies, she convinces her lethargic widowed mother that they should move to New York City, and she launches herself out to find a job. And she slowly tries to make a life for herself and climb the financial ladder. It’s not a thrillingly dramatic book, but you get the feeling that it’s pretty accurate, which is what makes it interesting, a bit of an artifact.
The Home-Maker is by Dorothy Canfield, who I’d never heard of, but she was a very popular author in the first half of the 20th century, having earned a PhD at a time when most women didn’t go to college at all. This doesn’t have the place in literary history that a Lewis book does, but this is much the livelier of the two, in terms of style. A married couple with three children is getting by, but not happily, as the husband is a low-earner and the wife has become a tyrannical perfectionist running of the household, also in the 1920s. Then chance intervenes, and she is forced to be a bread-winner while the husband tends the home-fires.
Have any of you read either of them?