I think a few posters need to read at least a basic primer on white feminism. The concept of white feminism has nothing to do with black women rejecting all feminism or black women thinking that feminism is inherently white, or black women not knowing what a woman is (wtf??).
It's black women rejecting white women who promote feminism while actively or passively engaging in racism, or who simply ignore the fact that black women experience sexism and misogyny in a different way from white women, or who actively exploit feminism in order to be racist. (Like all the cases in America where white women have phoned the police and faked being in tears and lied about feeling threatened in order to harass some ordinary black man, black woman, black child, black family, innocently minding their own business swimming in a public pool or having a picnic in a park. That's abusing feminism because it exploits tropes about female vulnerability.)
Of course some black women have come to the decision that they don't feel comfortable in modern feminist discourse at all because of all the racism. Some choose not to use the term "feminist" for that reason. It doesn't mean they're against the core values of feminism.
It's a bit like a woman saying she's not interested in joining a "male rugby" team, and her friends acting baffled and saying "but why do you believe that rugby is male? Why do you reject all rugby?" She doesn't, she just doesn't want to join that one specific team that advertises itself as being men-only. Not wanting to join a "male rugby team" doesn't mean you hate rugby or think all rugby is male. Just like rejecting a person/group/theory that excludes or is racist towards black women doesn't mean you're against all feminism or think all feminism is racist. No one thinks all feminism is racist!
But there is a history of feminists and feminist movements actively exploiting or engaging in racism. For example, some early American feminist groups stole specific phrasing and blueprints from abolitionist (anti-slavery) groups, or tried to align and compare the domestic oppression of white American women, with the oppression of black slaves. That's racist. It's the same as someone saying "the scale of misogynistic violence is basically the Holocaust." No it's not. The scale of misogynistic violence is terrible but comparing it to the Holocaust is unnecessary and completely offensive to Jewish people. There's other specific examples of feminist history being racist, for example some of the suffragettes actively campaigned against black men being allowed to vote. Stuff like that are what black women are talking about when they say "white feminism."
It's the same thing with disability. A lot of feminism ignores disability and ignores the fact disabled women experience sexism and misogyny differently from able-bodied women. As women we are oppressed by our biology and our bodies, and being disabled puts an extra layer on that. Feminism has to acknowledge that. There's basic stuff like how many feminist spaces lack disability access so disabled feminists can't even get in the room. If you can't get in the room, how can your voice be heard? But other stuff that's more ideological. For example, I can't count how many times I've attended feminist lectures or discussions where someone - usually a slim, conventionally attractive able-bodied white woman - has said something along the lines of, "all women and girls are sexualised from a young age, every single woman and girl gets cat called, yadda yadda." But if you're visibly disabled you're far more likely to be de-sexualised than the opposite. I'm not saying that disabled women are never harassed because of course that's not true, but disabled people are treated like they're sexless and infantalised all the time, it's a well-known form of ableism. The reason this is a feminist issue is that both those responses come from the same misogynistic place, which is the patriarchy's assumption that women exist to be pleasing to men's eyes.