I think if you can have cultural appropriation in music and art, you can have it in literature too. And yes, what I'm talking about is also bad research/writing, but it isn't necessarily. I mean, JK Rowling got into a lot of trouble for nicking Native American stereotypical beliefs for her American magic in Fantastic Beasts. The criticism wasn't that she was a poor writer. Just that those beliefs weren't hers to play with.
is it ethical that Harris, with her position if privilege (white, previously published and successful British author, with the backing of book deals/publishing house and promotion) should be the one telling and profiting from this story. Do writers from Grenada have the same opportunities to write, publish and make money from this story?
No, they don't. But I don't think it makes Harris unethical for wanting to tell that story. (Though it might make publishers unethical for publishing her version and not a black writer's, presuming such a thing to exist, and society unethical for creating a world where a white writer felt able to tell that story and a black writer didn't, presuming it not to exist).
I'm white, so I don't know what this debate feels like to a black reader. But I know what the lack of female writers/female-lead stories in film/television feels like as a female viewer. Which is that ideally I would rather have more female writers telling female-lead stories. But that I also value and appreciate male writers writing more and better female characters, because that's a good in itself.
(Although, interestingly, while I'm an enthusiastic cheerleader for a female-lead show like Buffy, which had a male show runner, I'd be pretty vociferously annoyed if they gave, say, Call the Midwife to a male show runner. Because that's such a female show, I feel like it needs and deserves a woman at the helm. Which, er, isn't very logical.) #contradictsselfwildly #um