Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

False Colours: Georgette Heyer Book Club No. 29

16 replies

LadyIsabellaWrotham · 01/08/2014 09:09

Comments on the previous thread are suggesting that I may be alone in loving this one. Yes it's ridiculous, and has plot holes you can drive a bus through but it's such fun! And the characters!

This is the one where Kit, the sensible diplomatic twin, sits in for Evelyn, the volatile older twin in order to save the prospective marriage of convenience Evelyn is meant to make to enable him to pay off darling Mama's debts. With, as they say in the worst sitcoms, hilarious consequences.

The plot is hampered by the fact that all the elegant dalliance and farce at the country house is carried out despite the fact that Mama and Kit know that Evelyn has been missing for weeks and should by rights be distracted. This is such a huge problem that Heyer is forced to paper it over, for the first time since The Black Moth, with actual magic Hmm and Kit's mysterious "twin instinct" that brings him back from Vienna and lets him know that he doesn't really have to worry about Evelyn. Even worse than that is the long period of time where Evelyn is awake, and more or less recovered from his concussion, just up the road from home, but doesn't bother to send a discreet letter or messenger to tell his loving family he's not dead. That's really not defensible at all, but I forgive it because it has been engineered to give enough time for Cressy/Kit and Patience/Evelyn to fall in love, and to have a dramatic reappearance of Evelyn at dead of night, followed by shennaigans with Evelyn at Nurse's house, both of which I feel are so enjoyable to be worth a humungous tiny plot hole.

What makes this rubbish worthwhile? I think that there is much to enjoy that's distinctive to this book. The relationship between Kit and Evelyn seems very real as an adult sibling friendship. Bonamy Ribble is hilarious and a new type, and the devotion of the boys to their adorable but flawed mother, like Sylvester's to his, marks them out as perfect husband material (though the Relationships board might disagree). And surely everyone loves Cressy and the idylling country interlude in which they fall in love - that is something that we have seen many times before, most notably in Venetia, but it's a personal favourite trope of mine.

Beyond the fun frivolities, the shadow of Mama's marriage is what gives this book heart and depth. We've seen early heroines rejecting matches of convenience and holding out for True Love. We've seen the disastrous consequences of an arranged marriage in Infamous Army, and, finally we've seen a successful marriage of convenience in Civil Contract. But here we finally see the other side, the starry-eyed love match which goes disastrously wrong due to underlying incompatibility. I love the way that the boys and the Dowager discuss it openly, but they all show a tendency to drift towards treating it as a traditional sacrifice of Mama by her parents. It takes Mama herself to point out that she entered into it keenly, albeit without full understanding of her husband's character.

Mama is often suggested to be an echo of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, in her character, disastrous marriage, addiction to gambling and enormous debts (almost 4 million in today's money). Actually, from today, she reminds me more of Georgiana's great-great-great-great niece Diana, Princess of Wales, in her doomed marriage to a wholly unsuitable Prince Charming, her looks, dress sense and charm, her pitiable affair and mutual devotion with her boys. Diana benefits from the comparison of course, since for all her flaws she was never as frivolous as Mama, and not a hopeless gambling addict.

So what do you think?
Can you live with Mama and Bonamy's fairy tale ending? (I can, as long as I don't think about the sex)
Is Kit just too perfect?
Should Cressy have been able to forgive Kit?
Is it a flaw to have Evelyn end up in a love-at-first-sight-marriage when that's what did for Mama?

OP posts:
Takver · 01/08/2014 18:48

Definitely not alone in loving it - about to go out, but I'll be back, as this is a favourite of mine :) (To the extent that if dd had been a ds, I'd have been arguing very hard to name her/him Kester)

HoratiaDrelincourt · 01/08/2014 20:59

Great start!

I don't think this book is really about Kit and Eve at all. It's almost totally about their mother - she gets the beststory, the best lines, the best pathos even. I think Heyer is exploring female maturity and concepts of motherhood, wifehood (word?) and femininity within the straitjacket of the Regency ... but with a love story and light mystery tacked on to help her with plot drive and characterisation. And I think her story is terribly sad, with echoes of what could so easily have happened to Horry, or Nell, or Arabella.

I am on twatphone with a nearly-asleep baby on me, so will comment further when on laptop.

HoratiaDrelincourt · 01/08/2014 22:45

I think the novel is unusually candid and negative about marriage, oddly enough. Although we've gone through dozens of happy marriages in this novel, Heyer is taking care to show us that many, possibly most, marriages were disappointing if not outright miserable. There was no expectation of happiness, or of love. And while the men might carry on regardless, the women were trapped.

The very qualities which had fascinated Denville in the girl offended him in the wife, and he set himself to the task of eradicating them.

It's chilling, isn't it?

"She told me that I must be the last person to wish to see my son make an unhappy marriage, for that was what I did myself. I must own, Kit, that I was very much touched."

His pleasant grey eyes looked steadily down into hers, the suggestion of a smile in them. "Tell me, Mama, were you so unhappy?"

"Often!" she declared.

Kit may not have understood his mother's misery, but Evelyn does.

"She was seventeen when my father married her! [...] My father - years older than she was! - fancied himself to be in love with her! Love? He was dazzled by her face, and her captivating ways, and had no more love for her than I have for Cressida Stavely! Everything in Mama which makes her so lovable he disliked! Kester, he drove her off - pokered up when she showed her affection, in that impulsive way she has! It was not the thing for Lady Denville to allow the world to suspect she had a heart!"

She lets slip to Cressy how terrible it was, later on, and by accident:

"But in every other way it is most agreeable, I find [, to be a widow]. In fact, far more agreeable than being a wife! At least, it is for me, but not, of course, for you, dearest!" she hastened to add, with one of her lovely smiles. It faded; she looked stricken all at once, and older; and said: "I was forgetting. You see, it is of no consequence." Two large tears welled over her eyelids, and rolled unheeded down her cheeks.

The irony is, of course, that at the beginning Cressy is actually being urged into a similar society marriage: it was a very good match, and [...] Cressy, at the age of twenty, and with a dowry of only £25,000, would be a fool to draw back from it. There's absolutely no reason that she and Evelyn will not prove to be so unfavourably matched, and so miserable, as well. But that's all right, because it isn't for their own benefit, but for financial and dynastic reasons.

Kit was ready to swear that if [Evelyn] married Miss Stavely he would never use her unkindly, or wound her pride by blatantly pursuing some other female. Whether he would remain faithful to her was another and more doubtful matter; but he would conduct his affaires with discretion. Presumably Miss Stavely, no schoolroom miss, but a rational woman, entering openly into a marriage of convenience, was prepared for some divagations, and would demand no more of Evelyn than the appearance of fidelity.

Even Kit, who supposedly loves Evelyn more than it's possible to love another person, does not have high expectations of him, nor of the marriage. And Cressy has no better expectations:

"We were agreed, were we not, that only candour on both our parts could make our projected alliance tolerable to either of us? Your reason for wishing to be married is your very understandable desire to become independent of your uncle; mine is - is what I feel to be an urgent need to remove myself from this house - from any of my father's houses!"

Meanwhile, Lady Denville ends up using marriage to reestablish her social (and financial) position, despite the fact that she feels only a slight affection for Sir Bonamy, who throughout is shown as something of a buffoon: Owing to the height and rigidity of his collar-points, and the depth of his Oriental tie, Sir Bonamy could neither shake his head, nor nod it. When he wished to signify assent, he was obliged to incline the upper part of his body in a stately manner which frequently exercised an unnerving effect upon strangers already awed by his size and magnificence.

And this is despite the fact that she has to trick him into proposing, teases him that he doesn't want to, and only does so because she can't bear to live with other women, can't pay her bills, and feels that the title "Dowager" is terribly ageing!!

And she has effectively to ask Evelyn's permission to marry Sir Bonamy. That is, she doesn't really, but she can't afford not to secure his approval, and has a job to secure it. In the end Evelyn is only won over for practical, financial reasons. His own love match notwithstanding, he sees marriage as primarily a financial and legal transaction.

On the other hand, it's interesting that while our heroines are gradually getting older (thank goodness) this is our youngest hero for a good while. Obviously that makes me more convinced that it isn't really about him Grin but 24 is very young. I think only Sherry and Vidal are that young, and is Harry Smith (who doesn't count) only a year older? In any case, Kit is only four years older than Cressy, so it's already more of an equal partnership than we're used to - Heyer falling out of love with the Avon/Leonie model again.

A minor gripe is that Heyer tells us too much in this novel. In better novels she shows - here we have three chapters of exposition before anything happens. It's not good.

So essentially I think it's good, but not for the usual Heyer reasons. She's out of her groove and we need her back. Frederica next, thank goodness!! Back to rich older man and irrepressible younger girl, supported by awkward teenagers and comic children - we know where we are there.

ShutUpLegs · 02/08/2014 11:48

LOVE the "actual magic"

I also think that Cressy's father's second marriage and her uncomfortable relationship with her step-mother puts another facet into the exploration of transactional marriage. And the brilliant scene where Cressy helps KIt see off the mother of Evelyn's discarded mistress is another view on the hypocrisies of aristocratic marriage at that time (and perhaps now for all I know!). This is all about the reality of marriage after the glow has gone - and perhaps is what ultimately undermines itself - can a romantic novel truly succeed if it is pulling apart the very stuff of which it is made?

I deeply love Bonamy Ripple for his name alone if nothing more. He is Venetia's step-father again, isn't he, but Mama is much nicer than Venetia's mother. And I do like the domestic notes about her bedroom decorations and the superior oil for lamps.

Its not first tier but its great fun.

Tanaqui · 02/08/2014 11:53

I love this one- one of the first few I read when I was pretty young so I missed a lot of the marriage stuff, but it is really funny- the dialogue is literally lol at times- and I love a twin contrast to Sylvester.

HoratiaDrelincourt · 02/08/2014 13:07

yy good points re the other marriages, and other twins! Are there any others apart from Prudence and Robin?

Takver · 02/08/2014 18:30

My feeling is that the 'identical twins sensing each other's wellbeing' thing is such a well worn literary cliche that it's forgiveable - also, GH does fudge it a bit in that we're told that Evelyn is very unreliable, and also that they're certain he's taken his card case, & therefore would have been IDd in the case of any accident. I guess also Kit and Mama have got themselves so deep in the deception, that they can't back out regardless.

Cressy is the main reason I like this one so much - I struggle with GH's young & ditsy heroines (don't really like Friday's Child for that reason), and I'm much happier with the books where we have more a relationship of equals. (I like Black Sheep for the same reason.)

I also like Kit, the fact that he has a job (of sorts, at any rate) and isn't vastly wealthy and able to solve every problem with a bottomless purse.

As pointed out, False Colours is far more realistic on the subject of marriage than the other books. Cressy's choice to accept Evelyn is a soft centre version of Charlotte Lucas accepting Mr Collins as a least-worst option, and as pointed out, we see one possible outcome of older man with ditsy but beautiful child-bride in Mama's disastrous marriage. At the same time, I think it's one of her funniest books, & the scene where Cressy confronts Mrs Alperton is one of my favourite GH set pieces.

I think though that Mama & Bonamy Ripple will actually be very happy together - she needs to be adored and made much of, and he is the obvious choice to do this - I don't see her as sacrificing herself.

The one bit I don't think really does it for me is Evelyn & Prudence - I think I just have to believe that actually she'll see sense and send him on his way & get married to some nice reliable curate.

IrenetheQuaint · 02/08/2014 19:11

My main problem with False Colours is the sheer lack of plot - most of the time our characters are just drifting around the family pile while nothing happens, with unnecessary padding from the tedious Ambrose and his parents. Also, the climax is really weak for reasons suggested above.

However, it has several redeeming features. I really like Kit, and on rereading the novel he has definitely joined the select list of Heyer heroes I would, er, contemplate advancing my relations with. Very unusually (Charles Audley is the only other example, I think) he is a younger son and hence has to have an actual JOB. As a result he has a much more interesting life than most GH heroes, and doesn't spend his whole time thinking about cravats and horses.

There are a few classic scenes - Mrs Alperton, of course, and Mama's masterful proposal to Bonamy (who I like - he is genuinely good natured, if not exactly full of get up and go, and to me they seem very well suited). Also, Kit and Cressy's relationship is touching, and realistic. We see them get to know each other gradually on equal terms, and there is a lovely conversation between them about the Grand Tour which demonstrates how well suited they are, and what an interesting and happy life they will have together, in comparison with all the other depressing examples of marital failure mercilessly depicted here.

It's weird how many structural similarities there are with Sylvester, right down to the heroine being a god-daughter of the hero's mother, yet the hero never having heard of her existence. There's a bit in the Jane Aiken Hodge biog of GH where she comments about False Colours feeling a little tired at times (e.g. Patience and her charming clerical family being a precise copy of Patience and family in The Nonesuch) and I guess that's what's going on here.

Tanaqui · 02/08/2014 21:18

I don't think prudence and robin are twins though are they?

I agree the patience repetition is a bit odd- so quickly too!

HoratiaDrelincourt · 02/08/2014 21:54

oops, yes sorry maybe the Tremains aren't twins after all.

LadyIsabellaWrotham · 05/08/2014 23:05

Very

OP posts:
LadyIsabellaWrotham · 05/08/2014 23:08

Very good point about Venetia's mother. Mama is exactly the same except that she has all the maternal instinct that Venetia's mother so appallingly lacks. If it wasn't for the twins Amabel would have been off with some good looking chancer within two years of marriage (and who could blame her).

OP posts:
LadyIsabellaWrotham · 02/09/2014 21:33

Are people thinking Frederica thoughts yet?

OP posts:
TwoAndTwoEqualsChaos · 05/09/2014 00:28

Ooh, I'm rather late, but I'm another who loves this and wasn't allowed to call a child "Kit"!. Yes, there are some gaping holes (and I'm not actually that keen on Sir Bonamy/Amabel/Evelyn) but Kit and Cress and delightful and very believable and I think some of the comedic scenes are fabulous. I'm with Takver on disliking "ditsy" heroines and this is a book I return to with joy and which amuses me, even though I know the plot twists.

joanofarchitrave · 14/09/2014 16:54

I always enjoy reading this one, largely due to Cressy. Originally it was a magazine serial which was put back together for publication as a novel (though I'd imagine it was always intended to do this in the end) which might explain why it doesn't feel as structurally sure-footed as many of the other novels. I haven't ever bothered to go back and try to work out where the episodes finished though.

MissClemencyTrevanion · 04/10/2014 20:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page