Oh dear, I'm afraid I was very disappointed with this book and I'm very sorry to say that as I'm sure there is an awful lot of work that has gone into it. It was just to impersonal and short. I felt like there was an awful lot missing from each persons story, there was just no meat to it at all and when I put it down, I wasn't too bothered about picking it back up again. My 13 year old daughter has just started to read it (I might add that she is has a huge appetite for books and is extremely mature) and she can't put it down, so maybe it is a good way to start reading about psychoanalysis?
I think maybe I wanted to know more about the technicalities behind each story and it was just too jargon free for me, I would also have like to know a few conclusions. Also I feel that there just wasn't enough of the author in this book, I don't know if he's just written what he was supposed to 'technically' feel about his clients rather than what he really did think about them. Even when he's written negatively about his thoughts on his clients, for instance, when his mind was wandering and he wasn't really listening to one of his clients, it turns out it was because the client wasn't even engaged in himself thus taking away any blame we may have put on the author.
As I said, I don't like to write reviews like this because I know that years of work have gone into it, it wasn't for me at all but I can see that most other people have really enjoyed it.
My question(s) to the author - you deal with so many complex problems and different scenarios with people, how do you leave your work there and not take it home with you?
Do you think your book was a way of dealing with your work, a sort of output for you?
Are there many clients that you turn away due to beliefs, morals etc.?
Do you find that you judge people too readily?