I have some weight watchers scales I bought years ago. They weigh to the nearest quarter lb. I like that as it shows progress (or not) quickly.
But weight isn't a great measure, albeit it's that or taking measurements of your body (e.g. waist circumference). Weight is more impacted by daily water fluctuations than actual fat loss.
Personally I always weigh first thing in PJs before anything to eat as that's going to be something I can consistently do daily. I weigh daily and (try to) accept that there is more fluctuation in daily measures than will be accounted for by weight loss. I used to weigh fortnightly (Paul McKenna, I can make you thin method) but I founded that didn't work for me. I record one weight per week on a spreadsheet and use an app for my daily weights. I've also recently started to record my lowest weight over the week on the same spreadsheet which motivates me a little if there's no loss that week as the lowest weight is consistently showing a reduction week on week on week.
So all in all I accept it's an inaccurate measure and live with it.
While I don't follow the Paul McKenna book anymore, he did have some views on daily weighing which I think puts some of it into perspective (albeit it's a work in progress). He described it like a flightpath. When you look at a plane flight path they get from A to B but are often turning slightly left or right. Same if you're driving. So few roads in the UK are direct. You often have to go slightly left or right to get to where you want to go. Same with weight, it's the overall trend that matters, not each turn.
He also describes weighing daily as being like pulling up a plant to check it's roots every day. I do get that but I found his suggestion to weigh less often meant I could easily gain. So in a way I've tried a combo. I weigh daily but try not to stress about it and record "officially" weekly.
As others have said. When you weigh is less important than being consistent about it.