Here you go OP - this is from Milli Hill’s substack “Unprocess” and I’ve just copied and pasted some of the relevant bits. Well to be honest the whole article is relevant but as you have to be a paid subscriber to access it I don’t feel like I should copy and paste the whole thing!
A new study from a team at University College London (that includes the author of Ultra Processed People, Chris van Tulleken), has focused on the question of whether a diet of minimally processed food (MPF) will have a different impact on weight loss than a diet of ultra processed food (UPF), even if both diets follow national 'Eatwell’ guidelines in terms of their nutritional content.
In the study, 55 adults, all of whom were living with overweight or obesity, alternated between two eight week diets, one of which was almost completely based on UPF - for example ready meals, boxed cereals and snack bars; and the other which was all freshly prepared MPF, for example overnight oats, and homemade spaghetti bolognese.
In both diets, participants were given more food than they were thought likely to eat and told to eat as much or as little as they liked. And on both the UPF and the MPF diet, their meals complied with the NHS ‘Eatwell’ guide.
On both diets, both UPF and MPF the participants lost weight.
But on the MPF diet, the weight loss was significantly higher.
In fact, during the MPF diet, weight loss was almost double.
And here is a link to the study:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03842-0?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email