Reducing your food intake from over eating (disordered) to normal healthy eating within a calculated calorie budget isn’t disordered. The disordered eating comes when you attach unhealthy emotions and dependencies onto food, dieting or your body and you develop unhealthy ways of thinking or behaviours.
If you become preoccupied by food to the point where you question every morsel you eat and the repercussions it could have, this could be disordered. For those who find IF really easy to do, this is probably not disordered. Calorie counting or IF becomes disordered if you are making yourself suffer and become restrictive so if someone with IF is really hungry but won’t break the fast for fear of weight gain or this ‘body reset factor’ or terrified of insulin (normal, everyone has this we could die without it) this would be an unhealthy view of what IF is meant to achieve.
IF is controlling your food intake the same way calorie counting is - both are methods of monitoring your food intake they are just different. IF people believe they are free from having to count calories (and somehow superior when people like to boast they can fast for 20 hours) but they are counting time instead. Still counting.
The disorder for me IMO is demonising foods (a grape has too much sugar and will cause XYz) or accidentally eating something outside of a fast will lead to repercussions. IF or CC mixed with keto is probably one of the worst ones I see here for disordered thinking around food with snippets of science or nutrition thrown around as gospel facts.
This is a weight loss forum so coming to post about IF with no active plan to lose weight will probably cause some confusion, if you post about IF then announce 5 posts later its not for weight loss purposes I think that’s on the OP not the respondents