I'm Asian and having a mixed traditions wedding. Asian weddings are always open bar. They're also typically very large (e.g. 350 came to my cousin's). They're typically hosted in dry hire venues for this reason.
However I'm very keen on a lovely venue immediately behind the church where we're having our ceremony. It's lovely, set into a nature reserve, is personally meaningful to us (we went to both the reserve and the church on our first date) and would be very convenient.
BUT it's not dry hire - the venue runs the bar.
We're also provisionally holding a dry hire venue, also set in a park and pretty nice, but definitely less meaningful and magical.
The hire costs of both actual venues are comparable. If we go with the dry hire venue we'd also be looking at hiring a coach to schlep everyone across from the church at about £600.
Our guest list is relatively small, we're expecting 170 to come, but assuming 3x drinks per drinker plus soft drinks, a bar tab is still likely to cost us £4k.
Meanwhile if we went with a dry hire hall we could source enough booze for 5x drinks per person for £1.2k
I suppose my question is - would it be considered rude or unacceptable to operate some kind of drinks token system to ensure everyone gets a fair go at the tab? And then cash bar afterwards?
OR should we just forget the whole thing and go with the dry hire venue?
What are guests more likely to appreciate/remember? The venue or the bar?