I agree with Riven. Also don't like to call it Baby Led Weaning as it sounds a bit modish, a fad.
It was how weaning was done years ago before food companies had a vested interest in persuading you there were special stages to follow and, special food and equipment to buy (Hi Annabel). And that you should buy enter the market as soon as possible.
My local authority's new weaning leaflet in conjunction with the Dept of Health and NHS now is basically BLW - finger foods, family foods, self-feeding, exclusively FF/BF until 6 months - they just don't call it that.
That coupled with the fact Gill Rapley works for UNICEF certainly legitimate it in my mind. Sorry if that's sounds odd but I've encountered opposition to BLW from family/friends and I do like to remind myself that it's not an oddball, fringe activity.
I think "blw" will be of increasing interest to health professionals because obesity-related illness is a massive issue. I can't think of a better way to create over-eating habits than spoon-feeding processed food from a very early age ('come on, just one more, here comes the aeroplane'). I have seen some really adverse effects of parents (with unimpeachably good intentions - I am not blaming anyone) trying to 'control' a child's food intake or going to war over food. Or aligning eating with 'good' and 'bad' behaviour.
Sorry this is a very ranty post. I am also going to do it because I am too tight to buy Hipp and hate both butternut squash and washing up blender attachments.
Having said all that I haven't actually started yet - who knows, I may be running for the stewed apple and baby rice...
SydneyB - yes, I know some HVs who think the solution to slow weight gain is baby rice. Never more milk. Or indeed if slow weight gain over a short period is an issue at all.