Having grown up around prolific "they are 12 weeks so get the baby rice" parents (including my own) and most people I know are still in this genre, my decision to still not give DD any food at 20 weeks has raised a couple of eyebrows.
Thankfully she is a bit chunky, so at least I don;t have anyone saying "milk's not enough for her blah blah"
So, it may well be BLW for us. Do I have to wait for a specific age? Any food I do give will be on top of any milk she is allready getting as I understand that most of it wont get eaten and not that calorific anyways.
DD sits on my lap nicely, with my hands on her hips, and in her Bumbo well. She picks everything up and puts it in her mouth (favourite being her feet).
I know you all suggest seeing if she takes any food off my plate but quite honestly she rarely sees me eat as I tend to have lunch during her lunchtime nap and dinner after she goes to bed at around 6.30. Do I need to start eating with her?
Also, if we were to go to, say a Carvery, could I give her a bit of broccoli or carrot from there or should I not incase they've been cooked in salted water?
It's confusing but exciting. I also like the feeling of being a bit of a local renegade. I do know of someone who I see every now and again who did something similar with her DD so I may have a chat with her next time we cross paths (she does BF support work too, so am sure is used to people asking for support).