Advice post, trying to keep identifying details vague.
I work at a large energy company, in a role that's a couple of years old for me - moved in laterally from another part of the business. Most of my direct team have been there much longer than me.
Got my half-year review recently. Overall rating: lowest tier ("Needs Improvement"). This came completely out of nowhere - no mention in any of our regular catch-ups over the past six months that anything was below standard.
My manager has acknowledged, in writing, that I've delivered the actual work to a high standard. The stated issue is that the type of work I've been given apparently isn't considered the same level as others. So essentially: they gave me smaller-scope work, then rated me down for it not being big enough.
I pushed back in writing, pointing out that I'd actually raised concerns myself earlier in the year about whether certain tasks were at the right level. My manager has framed some of my pushback as being about confidence rather than what it actually was - me questioning the level of work, not avoiding it. The irony of this isn't lost on me.
Has anyone dealt with something similar or have any advice?
Specifically:
How common is it for a low rating like this to lead to a formal improvement plan, especially with zero prior warning?
Is it even worth pushing this with HR, or do they mostly just protect the company?
Would you keep fighting this or just quietly start looking elsewhere?
Thanks for reading this far.