Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

30 days only

Rated badly out of nowhere

5 replies

Stopscrollingplease · 31/07/2026 12:47

Advice post, trying to keep identifying details vague.

I work at a large energy company, in a role that's a couple of years old for me - moved in laterally from another part of the business. Most of my direct team have been there much longer than me.

Got my half-year review recently. Overall rating: lowest tier ("Needs Improvement"). This came completely out of nowhere - no mention in any of our regular catch-ups over the past six months that anything was below standard.

My manager has acknowledged, in writing, that I've delivered the actual work to a high standard. The stated issue is that the type of work I've been given apparently isn't considered the same level as others. So essentially: they gave me smaller-scope work, then rated me down for it not being big enough.

I pushed back in writing, pointing out that I'd actually raised concerns myself earlier in the year about whether certain tasks were at the right level. My manager has framed some of my pushback as being about confidence rather than what it actually was - me questioning the level of work, not avoiding it. The irony of this isn't lost on me.

Has anyone dealt with something similar or have any advice?

Specifically:
How common is it for a low rating like this to lead to a formal improvement plan, especially with zero prior warning?
Is it even worth pushing this with HR, or do they mostly just protect the company?
Would you keep fighting this or just quietly start looking elsewhere?

Thanks for reading this far.

OP posts:
Betadelta · 31/07/2026 12:52

I'd do both. I would quietly start looking around, but the job market isn't easy at the moment so it might take you a while to find something. In the meantime, I'd definitely continue the conversation with your manager and question the level of work you are given if it doesn't seem to be the right standard going forwards.

It's hard to say whether this rating will lead to a formal improvement plan as this varies a lot by company. Perhaps an informal, confidential chat with HR would allow you to ask this?

Stopscrollingplease · 31/07/2026 13:17

Betadelta · 31/07/2026 12:52

I'd do both. I would quietly start looking around, but the job market isn't easy at the moment so it might take you a while to find something. In the meantime, I'd definitely continue the conversation with your manager and question the level of work you are given if it doesn't seem to be the right standard going forwards.

It's hard to say whether this rating will lead to a formal improvement plan as this varies a lot by company. Perhaps an informal, confidential chat with HR would allow you to ask this?

I have started to look and the market is really tough and basically no part time roles anywhere so I sort of feel stuck at the moment and living in anxiety until they may or may not get rid of me. Is it worth continuing to challenge the rating or do I just accept defeat. Feels so unfair.

OP posts:
CurlyKoalie · 31/07/2026 13:18

You say you were allocated the tasks.It seems unfair to be downgraded because a low level task was given to you by someone else. Unless of course there was a reason you were given the easier work. Do you know why that was or could you find out?
The way forward would seem to be to say to HR that having done the easy allocated work well, you feel you should now be given something more challenging so that you can show your true capabilities. Tell them that you feel the performance review was unfair given the restrictions placed upon you and you would like the opportunity to remedy their misconceptions.
This should elicit one of 3 responses.

  1. They will realise their error, show confidence in you and allocate more appropriate work.
  2. They will explain more thoroughly why they are not confident to give you more complex work, suggest improvement targets and maybe a mentor to help you. (Yes this the first stage of the competence process, but at least everything is out in the open and you have definite things to show that you should not be on that pathway)
  3. They may have actually recruited too many people at your level for the amount of complex work available and may be looking to get rid of people. In that case, keep all you documentation and make careful notes on how others are your grade are allocated work and treated. That could be useful if you have to claim unfair dismissal.
If you are a member of a Trade Union I would consult them on the last two scenarios should they apply.
Stopscrollingplease · 31/07/2026 13:24

CurlyKoalie · 31/07/2026 13:18

You say you were allocated the tasks.It seems unfair to be downgraded because a low level task was given to you by someone else. Unless of course there was a reason you were given the easier work. Do you know why that was or could you find out?
The way forward would seem to be to say to HR that having done the easy allocated work well, you feel you should now be given something more challenging so that you can show your true capabilities. Tell them that you feel the performance review was unfair given the restrictions placed upon you and you would like the opportunity to remedy their misconceptions.
This should elicit one of 3 responses.

  1. They will realise their error, show confidence in you and allocate more appropriate work.
  2. They will explain more thoroughly why they are not confident to give you more complex work, suggest improvement targets and maybe a mentor to help you. (Yes this the first stage of the competence process, but at least everything is out in the open and you have definite things to show that you should not be on that pathway)
  3. They may have actually recruited too many people at your level for the amount of complex work available and may be looking to get rid of people. In that case, keep all you documentation and make careful notes on how others are your grade are allocated work and treated. That could be useful if you have to claim unfair dismissal.
If you are a member of a Trade Union I would consult them on the last two scenarios should they apply.

They said because of my background experience they didn't give me that stuff but i don't think it is right to not be given the chance then rated down for it. Is that allowed? I have delivered very strongly in the role I have won our company a lot of things, improved processes too etc but they have kind of given me odds and ends and I have made the best of it.

OP posts:
Stopscrollingplease · 31/07/2026 13:25

Also to add consulted union but they couldn't help at informal stage just scared me about being put onto a PIP!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page