Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

30 days only

Which Unsolved Mysteries Do You Find Most Intriguing?

65 replies

Saidwater · 14/06/2026 21:38

For me it would be, "Who Put Bella in the Wych Elm".

Not just crimes - oddities of history, unexplained events etc.

Lesser known the better.

OP posts:
justinhawkinsnavalfluff · Yesterday 07:13

Loch Ness monster. Would love this to be true.

SupernaturalAddict · Yesterday 07:23

XelaM · Yesterday 06:52

They changed the policy after Germanwings I believe - two people have to be in the cockpit at all times.

I've seen documentaries on the Malaysia Air disappearance and I don't believe it was the pilot. There were so many odd circumstances with this.

However, on aviation disasters - LOCKERBIE is still a mystery to me because I believe Jim Swire's theory that the bomb was placed at Heathrow, not in Malta.

It was always two people in the flightdeck as a min when I worked as crew. Not just for this but if the FD became incapacitated/ill. Post 911 there were added reasons for this.

I'm not sure we'll ever find out the truth of what happened in either disaster. Thankfully incidents involving aircraft are uncommon.

I do love watching air crash investigation. It's my guilty pleasure. The Lockerbie drama with Colin Firth was brilliant. I don't think there are many people in the world who could do what he did.

jeanne16 · Yesterday 07:26

What happened to the two Princes in the Tower.

notimagain · Yesterday 08:12

@XelaM

They changed the policy after Germanwings I believe - two people have to be in the cockpit at all times.

This is something that can't be discussed in detail but I think it's perhaps safe to correct that before we get a rash of "who do I report what I saw on a flight to" from passengers...this is an "it depends".

For example the rules available in the publiv domain to.cover many operatord may state (to paraphrase) "two on the flightdeck or approved method of providing an equivalent method of safety...." so some airlines may have the policy of two upfront at all times, sounds like @SupernaturalAddict worked at one, but some may not.

I think it's also OK to point out the reason for that reg being worded in the way it is that two up front at all times might introduce other risks to the operation.

I'll leave it to folks to start engaging their inner Tom Clancey if they feel the need to work out what some of those other risks might be.

notimagain · Yesterday 08:18

Apologies for fat thumbs in the above...hope that makes sense.

SupernaturalAddict · Yesterday 08:48

notimagain · Yesterday 08:12

@XelaM

They changed the policy after Germanwings I believe - two people have to be in the cockpit at all times.

This is something that can't be discussed in detail but I think it's perhaps safe to correct that before we get a rash of "who do I report what I saw on a flight to" from passengers...this is an "it depends".

For example the rules available in the publiv domain to.cover many operatord may state (to paraphrase) "two on the flightdeck or approved method of providing an equivalent method of safety...." so some airlines may have the policy of two upfront at all times, sounds like @SupernaturalAddict worked at one, but some may not.

I think it's also OK to point out the reason for that reg being worded in the way it is that two up front at all times might introduce other risks to the operation.

I'll leave it to folks to start engaging their inner Tom Clancey if they feel the need to work out what some of those other risks might be.

Edited

I'd love to discuss this more but agree it's probably not the best idea on this forum. I honestly thought two in the FD at all times would be standard but yes I can see exactly why this wouldn't be the case.

notimagain · Yesterday 08:59

@SupernaturalAddict

Yep I'm sort of at the limit of my personal comfort level when it comes to talking about the specifics of this...however somewhere a few years back I did come across a magazine article, possibly in the European Press, possibly a handful of years after the Germanwings final report came out, that covered this topic in a lot of depth and detailed some of the pitfalls of always having two on the flight deck.

I'm working ATM but I may be able to find it/find a link to it later today.

SupernaturalAddict · Yesterday 09:25

Thank you, yes I think it's wise to not put anything extra out. I'd imagine many of the SEP and SOP have changed from what I knew but I if was still flying I'd appreciate peple holding their tongue as you never who it may inspire. Have a good day at work or flight if you're flying.

Sesquioxides · Yesterday 10:14

Arlanymor · 15/06/2026 21:42

That's solved now I think - a slab avalanche?

I’ve just been reading about Dyatlov pass. They seem to keep going back and forth on whether an avalanche/slab avalanche could have caused it (or even been possible in that area).

The mystery to me is in temperatures estimated to have been between -25 and -35, why would they have taken their clothes off in the first place. It’s always assumed they were barely dressed because they were sleeping but in those temperatures, in a flimsy tent, that doesn’t make sense to me. When I camp in cold weather (and never anything near that cold) I layer up to sleep, and that is with modern sleeping bag technology.

Also if the slab avalanche caused the injuries at the tent, we’re saying two of those hikers walked 1.5km to where they were found, with catastrophic internal injuries likened to being in a high velocity car crash, and the footprints surrounding the tent show everyone was mobile at the time they left. And why did Moscow shut down the investigation? So many uncertainties!

Arlanymor · Yesterday 11:16

Sesquioxides · Yesterday 10:14

I’ve just been reading about Dyatlov pass. They seem to keep going back and forth on whether an avalanche/slab avalanche could have caused it (or even been possible in that area).

The mystery to me is in temperatures estimated to have been between -25 and -35, why would they have taken their clothes off in the first place. It’s always assumed they were barely dressed because they were sleeping but in those temperatures, in a flimsy tent, that doesn’t make sense to me. When I camp in cold weather (and never anything near that cold) I layer up to sleep, and that is with modern sleeping bag technology.

Also if the slab avalanche caused the injuries at the tent, we’re saying two of those hikers walked 1.5km to where they were found, with catastrophic internal injuries likened to being in a high velocity car crash, and the footprints surrounding the tent show everyone was mobile at the time they left. And why did Moscow shut down the investigation? So many uncertainties!

Way too many questions for sure. I think the state of undress thing is nothing to do with sleeping as you say, but everything to do with paradoxical undressing. But yes too much that is unanswered, but some of it really does add up, so maybe partway to a solution?!

Somersetbaker · Yesterday 11:26

What happened to the missing ironing board?

Toddlerteaplease · Yesterday 12:14

jeanne16 · Yesterday 07:26

What happened to the two Princes in the Tower.

I think it’s time they did some DNA testing on the bones to finally find out who they are. They have the DNA from KR3 so it could be done.

KatherineParr · Yesterday 13:46

Ben Needham. His mum needs some answers. I know that the police have a theory based on someone coming forward but it's never been proven.

RumNotRun · Yesterday 13:52

A lot of the ones already named, but also Johnny Gosch, and Brandon Swanson.

user293948849167 · Yesterday 14:16

LlynTegid · 17/06/2026 18:49

Why anyone finds Mrs Brown's Boys funny.

Of the cold crime cases, who was really Jack the Ripper.

For Jack the Ripper check out “The house of Lechmere “ channel on YouTube- I am pretty convinced it was him, and they are interesting videos anyway even if you don’t end up convinced!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread