I very much agree with showing a united front" but you won't do that without open and transparent communication.
Basically you are asking posters genuinely interested in this subject to keep silent and "trust" that everything will be ok because the governing bodies are doing a huge amount of work behind the scenes, without telling them what that work is! And when the work they have done in the past has fed in to this issue?
I take your point that I am not a BD member and as such am out of the loop, and won't be receiving updates, but why the need for so much secrecy in the first place? It's this defensive and patronising attitude among the top echelons of the sport that is actually killing trust.
You said to me that,
there is a HUGE amount going on behind the scenes across the disciplines that you don’t see. Sometimes because it’s not appropriate to share with the public and sometimes because more work is yet to be done
It's fantastic to hear that there is a huge amount going on behind the scenes. It really is! But what in particular is 'not appropriate' to share? Does that mean there is a reluctance to admit publically that mistakes have been made?
Also, please credit us with some intelligence. No one thinks that changes and the funding to resource them, can be accessed in five minutes, but there has been imho, a lacklustre and guarded response to the CJD debacle, silence from most top riders, after years of less than optimum judging and training practices and competition performances being high-lighted, and trust among the general public has almost run out. Soon you are will be losing the trust of previously supportive horse owners and pro-equestrian sports people like me, who promote dressage (at a low level) as a way of improving balance and responsiveness in horse and rider alike.
My point is, you need to bring the public with you if the support is going to survive.
Changes will need to be fundamental and across the board if they are to be effective. It's not going to happen overnight, so why not update as you go along? And why only limit this communication to BD members?
In fact, given the negative attitude of the general public towards horse sports atm, I think it's more vital than ever to find a means of communicating all of the improvements that are happening and not turn inwards.
The public aren't stupid. They smell a rat when the issue is "spun" as an isolated incident pertaining to only one person in such a tight-knit sport.
You say there are no resources, but what do you think the CJD debacle has cost the sport, not just in terms of its reputation but also in sponsorship across all levels?