It was less because he was useless than that he was rude and useless.
I emailed the university and said I was going to tell him not to come back. They said "you can't do that. There's a process."
I said "he's dreadful and I don't want him back and I don't care about your process, and you can appeal to the head (which is what they wanted to do) but he'll back me because I am in charge of this."
They asked for a grace period, whilst they spoke to him. I generously complied with that. Within 48 hours he was back to his old tricks so I contacted the uni and told them I was done and he was not permitted on site. And that was that.
The unis are compelled to pass them all because it's how ofsted judge them. I am not because I don't want to employ useless teachers - I'm also in charge of induction so I am
lumbering a version of myself for another two years, which I won't do.
If there's any chance we can improve them, then I'll work within the framework. But if they start messing me around, I start emphasising the lack of professionalism in writing every time, and sending it to the tutor as well:
X was asked for the lesson plan by y. No lesson plan therefore x could not teach the lesson.
x was asked to ensure that he knew the 3 key misconceptions about z and to plan for them. This was not complete.
x was asked to send questions by email by y time in consideration of workload and well-being. X did not.
X was told to be at room z by y time. On 6/8 occasions this week. X has been late.
And I am really honest on the end of placement form. X does not yet have the subject knowledge to teach y, and in spite of support, does not appear committed to improving in this area.