I’d imagine it’s mostly younger teachers who are willing to sacrifice the TPS. They often aren’t as interested in pensions (not surprisingly) and they, along with lots of teachers actually, don’t grasp just what a benefit the TPS is and what a loss it is to work in a school without it.
Preps, being smaller than senior schools will generally struggle more with extra costs such as the employer contribution rising in TPS. Outside of London and the southeast, demand for independent education is far lower, and in many areas, lots of Preps have closed down or are merging, because quite simply there are too many for them all to operate at optimum size and be efficient. It’s going to be an ongoing trend and tends to bite even more in recession, and given Covid, the next few years will be hard for a number of independent schools where applications per place aren’t as high.
I think that over time, there really will become a 2 tier system of schools from the point of view of teachers. There will be those in the TPS and those that aren’t. It is true that staff recruitment to some degree is a localised thing, because lots of older staff might not be keen to significantly relocate their lives, but younger staff and some older staff will always move for work and the TPS honestly is such a superior pension. Teaching isn’t the best paid occupation and the pension has always been an absolutely key part of the benefits package. People could easily retire on a quarter of what they would have had, by not being in it but in a defined contribution scheme instead. It will have a massive impact on people’s retirements.
Perhaps this will be a further thing that drives this polarisation of schools in the independent sector. Various things are forcing school closures and mergers in some areas. These additional costs are one, plus recruitment issues will come into play in some too. It will take a while to emerge, but if staff leave schools that exit the TPS, and schools find the most qualified and best teachers (not always the same thing I know) expect the TPS, schools without it are missing something. Round here, when parents visit schools, they often ask if the school is still part if the TPS. They are a knowledgeable group and want to know that the school has got staff stability and ability to recruit into the future. Various parenting sites, where people discuss choosing schools, have this mentioned as a question to ask, in order to make comparisons between schools.
It’s a hard one. Schools have to balance their budgets and the increase in pension costs was 40%. That said, the share of overall costs of teacher pensions in the costs of running a school are of course far lower, and schools do have choices about where to make cost savings.
The bigger affiliations of schools such as HMC for senior schools, all tend to keep a close eye on what each other are doing. Not all those schools are big or successful or in the south east, but lots are. No-one wants to be the first to exit and take on a disadvantage. However, if lots of big names did it together, others probably would too. But for now, those costs are actually affordable for most larger schools and so they will keep going with it and as a way to ensure a longer term advantage in the market.
I would advise anyone considering taking a job in a non TPS school to research the impact of the different pensions on retirement income really carefully. I gave some figures upthread to illustrate the pension pot required to deliver what the TPS does. Most people who work a career in job with a defined contribution pot struggle to build a pot over their working life of £250,000. The average is actually only about £60,000. £250,000 would give an annual pension of less than £5k. Yes, there will be the state pension too, but £5k, compared to the £20k pension lots of teachers can reach without having significant management responsibilities is a vast difference.
When there’s a choice of where to work ....and bearing in mind most independents (over 85%) remain in the TPS, there just is just no need to take a job in one that doesn’t offer it. Maybe later that won’t be the case, it’s hard to know what the longer term picture will be, but for now it’s not something that HAS to be sacrificed in order to work in the independent sector, so why would you really, when it honestly is a MASSIVE big deal. I really think lots of teachers will look back on some of their choices with regret and say ‘if I’d only known the full implications I would have made different choices’.
Sorry for the rather zealous post. I feel really strongly about this because too many people haven’t looked into it enough and can find themselves in situations which will make a vast vast impact on their retirement.
If you work in a school that does this, and you cannot leave for various reasons, that’s one thing. However, if you are applying for jobs, to go for a non TPS school just seems madness, or significant lack of knowledge to me at the moment.