And does whatever that reason was, still exist?
I think I decided I wanted to teach when I was very little in the early 80s when I was still at infant school. I loved everything about my school which probably helped, but the structure (I thought) was great.
Every morning, we did maths cards (they must have hand written thousands of them!) which we worked through at our own pace-asking for help if we were stuck. The teacher would be at the front and helped any children who needed it. After play, we would do handwriting one day, spellings another day, then story writing, grammar and comprehension. All through textbooks or workcards at our own level.
In the afternoons, we did topic work, DT painting, sewing, PE and computers (well, 1 computer!).
It was a happy environment, we enjoyed school and did well-any children who needed a bit of extra help went off with Mrs X (who was actually a teacher!) for some slots during the morning as well. I just remember thinking that’s where I wanted to work.
In my training year-we still had topic webs and quite a lot of free choice about what to do, levels didn’t really exist in KS1, observations were by peers and were useful and planning could be done on a side of A4 but since then things have changed beyond all recognition and it really is a very different job to when I was at school.
Some things might be better now, but I’d argue that the mental health of children (and staff!) probably isn’t!
Did the literacy/numeracy hour make things better? What about learning walks, lesson ins, mini plenaries, P4C, talking partners, thinking hats, Bloom’s taxonomy, Mantle of the Expert, 3/5/7 part lessons, green pen, purple pen, APP, levels, removing levels, a side of A4 per lesson of planning and endless book trawls and pupil progress meetings.
Is the end result (the children’s learning) worth the massive amount of time that is spent now doing all of these things.
Is it that much better?
Sorry, that’s a bit maudlin really-I think I have really had enough now.