Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

King Charles - disquiet at Highgrove & the gardeners’ exodus - SUNDAY TIMES INVESTIGATION

665 replies

vera99 · 20/07/2025 06:59

Murdoch is growing bolder in his dotage — first with Trump, and now with another bombshell investigation into the grasping, stagnant, and catastrophically out-of-touch Windsors. And yet we keep pumping more public money into this so-called dysfunctional family.

What you need to know

King’s demands, staff shortages and low pay led to gardener exodus at Highgrove

Royal charity which runs gardens told to offer mental health support after formal investigation

Charles has lost 11 of 12 garden staff since 2022 including two head gardeners who quit within a year

Monarch said of one worker: “Do not put that man in front of me again”

After Ukraine invasion King proposed plugging staff shortages with war refugees or the elderly

At one point half of staff were on minimum wage

https://archive.ph/fspT3#selection-1495.0-1501.155

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
BemusedAmerican · 20/07/2025 15:52

@MaxandMeg somewhat off topic, but read Lucy Maria Boston's memoir, where she describes creating the garden at Hemingford Grey.

Here in NYC, our three botanic gardens rely on volunteers, especially retirees. Public parks rely on volunteers, many of them student required to do community service .

We have informal day labor hire sites, often big box hardware stores. Before the ICE raids, employers would stop off and hire people for the day. In my experience, most NYC landscaping companies are using migrants and probably paying cash for the day. Communication is with the team leader, as many of the employees don't speak English.

I've had a pesticide free garden plot for years. My main issue has been oleander aphids on the milkweed, which I spray off with water. I have sparrow who attack my zinnia leaves to get insects. The leaves sometimes end up with holes but they are aphid-free.

Screamingabdabz · 20/07/2025 15:53

IcedPurple · 20/07/2025 14:33

Thank you to The Times for your sterling work. No doubt Murdoch’s ancestors were once transported for some petty-fogging offence in the mother country, and this is his long-game revenge.

Yes, because a damp squib of a story about Highgrove gardeners is really going to make the monarchy come crashing down.

Your newfound fondness for Murdoch is the most noteworthy thing here.

Actually far from a ‘damp squib’ this gives another glimpse of how out of touch and entitled they are.

While the rest of us are trying to make ends meet and worrying about everything going on in the world, their priorities, whether it be growing flowers or sprinkling them on cakes, appears to be so at odds with ordinary people.

Things like this could just be the straw that breaks the camel's back for monarchists like me to say fuck it, let’s pack these baubles away in the loft forever after Charles goes….

Cardemomle · 20/07/2025 15:55

Thank you for sharing that, @Pubgarden .
It ties in with what I've heard people say as well.

bluegreygreen · 20/07/2025 15:56

OneSharpFinch · 20/07/2025 12:43

Its not strictly true that KC pays out of his private income for his gardeners, it's actually run by a charity the kings foundation.

A point made halfway through the article, not emphasised in the reporting or mentioned by the initial posters, is that the issues with funding have been mainly since the running of Highgrove Gardens was taken over by the charity, as previously KCIII would write personal cheques if there were shortages.

BemusedAmerican · 20/07/2025 16:08

@Screamingabdabz Pesticide -free gardening is really important. We need to keep pollinators of all kinds alive so that we can grow food to keep us alive.

Back in 2022, my job joined with a initiative to get people in the city to grow 1 foot by 1 foot plots of flowers to feed pollinators. I used an app to track my plots and was amazed at the number of solitary bees, butterflies, and flies that feed off it in the middle of a city.

I believe your Fields in Trust organization is trying to keep green spaces around the UK:

https://fieldsintrust.org/about-us/our-people

Our people

Our people

We’re lucky to work with a range of dedicated, dynamic and determined individuals who all care about parks and green spaces.

https://fieldsintrust.org/about-us/our-people

JSMill · 20/07/2025 16:20

Pubgarden · 20/07/2025 15:45

I've been wondering whether to write this - but what the hell.

I've met the King on several occasions (when he was Prince of Wales).

When I say met him, he was part of a team of people hedgelaying or taking part in hedgelaying competitions. I didn't sit opposite him in my best clothes for tea like Paddington.

I spoke to him only in the context of the task we had and about the countryside.
On all the occasions we were all out in the field for long winter days in all the weather could throw at us.

In no way could you have distinguished him or any of his behaviour from the other country people around him. We were everything from farmers to gardeners to professional hedgelayers.
A flask of tea and a hot dog at lunchtime and then back at the hedge.
He would not have stood out in any way - attitude, status, demeanor - were it not for the fact that he was probably wearing more worn clothes than the rest of us. He looked like he slept under the hedge when he finished.

He was interested, hardened to hard physical work, polite and focused on the task. He remembered me from the last time I had seen him and he remembered my dog. I don't recognise the person described here by people who've never met him.
As I say, I've no opinion on the royal family but can say the man I met was a decent fellow amongst peers.
I suppose I'd rather have them than Trump.

Thanks for sharing this. It’s a lovely anecdote.

Livelovebehappy · 20/07/2025 16:20

vera99 · 20/07/2025 07:28

If only the King loved his sons and grandchildren a tenth as much as he loves his precious gardens, they might think of him once in awhile after he leaves this world. So sad. I know he talks to his plants but does he shout at them as well .

I wouldn't fancy being the valet who brings the ironed copy of the papers on the silver salver to the drawing room - "Sir - there's an article in the Times you may wish to see". There's bullying in the Royal Family, that's clear to see and this one has receipts.

How do you know if he doesn’t treat his sons and grandchildren well? Are you privy to information the rest of us aren’t? His relationship with Harry is none existent because Harry sold stories on his family, and continues to sell his soul to the devil for attention and to top up his bank account. Items I’ve read suggest he has a lovely relationship with George, Charlotte and Louis.

jeffgoldblum · 20/07/2025 16:23

IAmATorturedPoet · 20/07/2025 15:49

I'm finding this new development quite amusing 😂

Me too! 🤣

Livelovebehappy · 20/07/2025 16:24

Screamingabdabz · 20/07/2025 15:53

Actually far from a ‘damp squib’ this gives another glimpse of how out of touch and entitled they are.

While the rest of us are trying to make ends meet and worrying about everything going on in the world, their priorities, whether it be growing flowers or sprinkling them on cakes, appears to be so at odds with ordinary people.

Things like this could just be the straw that breaks the camel's back for monarchists like me to say fuck it, let’s pack these baubles away in the loft forever after Charles goes….

Edited

Will never happen. Because the alternative is a President, and if you see the quality of prime ministers we get here, or the choices for America (Biden vs Trump at last election) who have millions more people to choose from than the UK, then I dread to think what we’d get.

jeffgoldblum · 20/07/2025 16:26

bluegreygreen · 20/07/2025 15:56

A point made halfway through the article, not emphasised in the reporting or mentioned by the initial posters, is that the issues with funding have been mainly since the running of Highgrove Gardens was taken over by the charity, as previously KCIII would write personal cheques if there were shortages.

Ah then it’s good news you have pointed this out to the op who is a trustee of a charity !

PigeonDress · 20/07/2025 16:32

@Pubgarden Thank you for your lovely posts. You should write a book!

IcedPurple · 20/07/2025 16:35

Screamingabdabz · 20/07/2025 15:53

Actually far from a ‘damp squib’ this gives another glimpse of how out of touch and entitled they are.

While the rest of us are trying to make ends meet and worrying about everything going on in the world, their priorities, whether it be growing flowers or sprinkling them on cakes, appears to be so at odds with ordinary people.

Things like this could just be the straw that breaks the camel's back for monarchists like me to say fuck it, let’s pack these baubles away in the loft forever after Charles goes….

Edited

Does anyone seriously think the royals are not 'out of touch and entitled' though? They grow up in palaces and have people bow to them and call them 'Your Royal Highness' practically from birth. Of course they're out of touch and entitled.

I think this article will barely make a ripple outside of those who follow the royals, and will be forgotten by the end of the week. If this is the worst they have on Charles, the monarchy is safe for some time to come.

octopustheslapper · 20/07/2025 17:24

Hotflushesandchilblains · 20/07/2025 13:26

Why would someone so rich be looking for volunteer labour to keep up his gardens? Or draft in refugees? Beggars belief. And to have anyone on minimum wage is unconscionable if it is true.

Do you know these refugees were not going to be paid?

octopustheslapper · 20/07/2025 17:25

vera99 · 20/07/2025 15:50

Great news I'm a trustee of a charity so I fully recognise the value of volunteers they are the backbone of Britain what we are discussing here is the way one of the richest and entitled monarchies in the world treats it staff. It's irrelevant about Murdoch who is ultimately a loathsome character. It's about how Charles the Third treats his staff and what we can infer from that. YMMV

No this article doesn't. It does make reference to some workers though. Don't exaggerate.

octopustheslapper · 20/07/2025 17:28

PigeonDress · 20/07/2025 14:28

You don't need to be sorry. I feel sorry for you and Graham. It's just not going as you hoped it would, is it.

Is this Graham Smith? I recall one of his books being touted on here by a poster whose name I recall.

simpsonthecat · 20/07/2025 17:35

There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that would surprise me about any members of the royal family. And we probably don't know half of it.

Charles should put his hand in his pocket and pay his staff more, he is a double billionaire after all! They must be local people I imagine and it's a very expensive area of the country to rent, buy or live.

I have a gardener who comes once a fortnight because of our too big garden and our age meaning we can't totally manage it on our own. I pay her probably double what Charles pays his gardening staff. And that is because I value her expertise and the backbreaking hard work she does when she is here. The royals are such tightwads, they desperately hang on to every penny they can.

bluegreygreen · 20/07/2025 17:40

Charles should put his hand in his pocket and pay his staff more

As noted above, when he was in charge of the gardens and funds were running low he did just that (mentioned in the article - have you read it?). The gardens are now run by the charity, the King's Foundation.

LadyJaneGrey18 · 20/07/2025 17:41

The going rate seems to be £20 to £25 an hour for a decent gardener for an ordinary garden .To pay less than minimum wage is a disgrace.

simpsonthecat · 20/07/2025 17:41

bluegreygreen · 20/07/2025 17:40

Charles should put his hand in his pocket and pay his staff more

As noted above, when he was in charge of the gardens and funds were running low he did just that (mentioned in the article - have you read it?). The gardens are now run by the charity, the King's Foundation.

Yes, thank you. I have read it. Twice actually. Have you?

simpsonthecat · 20/07/2025 17:42

LadyJaneGrey18 · 20/07/2025 17:41

The going rate seems to be £20 to £25 an hour for a decent gardener for an ordinary garden .To pay less than minimum wage is a disgrace.

Exactly. That is what I pay our wonderful gardener who comes once a fortnight.

PigeonDress · 20/07/2025 17:43

simpsonthecat · 20/07/2025 17:35

There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that would surprise me about any members of the royal family. And we probably don't know half of it.

Charles should put his hand in his pocket and pay his staff more, he is a double billionaire after all! They must be local people I imagine and it's a very expensive area of the country to rent, buy or live.

I have a gardener who comes once a fortnight because of our too big garden and our age meaning we can't totally manage it on our own. I pay her probably double what Charles pays his gardening staff. And that is because I value her expertise and the backbreaking hard work she does when she is here. The royals are such tightwads, they desperately hang on to every penny they can.

Do you understand that it is a charity that is employing them, not Charles directly? If your gardener felt underpaid, she'd go and find a more lucrative job. What's stopping the Highgate garden staff doing the same, since gardening jobs can be well paid (I pay a fortune for mine too)? Why do they stay or go there in the first place?

simpsonthecat · 20/07/2025 17:48

Because it's Highgrove. It doesn't make lbarely MW right. Hence the 11 out of 12 staff leaving.

CurlewKate · 20/07/2025 17:55

bluegreygreen · 20/07/2025 17:40

Charles should put his hand in his pocket and pay his staff more

As noted above, when he was in charge of the gardens and funds were running low he did just that (mentioned in the article - have you read it?). The gardens are now run by the charity, the King's Foundation.

But we’re talking about staff wages, surely? You can’t pay your rent from a handout from the boss. SURELY everyone can agree that the RF should
pay their staff properly? That strikes me as being entirely uncontroversial!

PigeonDress · 20/07/2025 18:03

simpsonthecat · 20/07/2025 17:48

Because it's Highgrove. It doesn't make lbarely MW right. Hence the 11 out of 12 staff leaving.

Then they have voted with their feet and left. Charity pays national minimum wage (set by the government) to people who want to go and work at a prestigious setting. Nobody forced to work there or stay there. Presumably doing set hours, not working unpaid like many private sector workers are. Other, more lucrative jobs in the same sector available. Are Highgrove doing something illegal? No. So what is your problem?

Cynic17 · 20/07/2025 18:05

octopustheslapper · 20/07/2025 10:39

All these comments yet no one has brought up the point that many of these people resigned because of a change in their working situation - previously employed by Charles who would put his hand in his own pockets for things needed but now employed under the Charity scheme.

Exactly. As I understand it, aren't the gardeners now employed by the charity, not by the King or the Duchy? So, a low wage is in keeping with the need to maximise returns for the charity. It's not ideal, but lots of charities only pay NMW (which is, of course, perfectly legal).
Thus seems like something of a storm in a teacup.