Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry v NGN 2

907 replies

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 23/01/2025 00:40

I don't think we're done talking - and I never start threads!

As you were!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
28
EdithWeston · 23/01/2025 11:53

ProjectFailed · 23/01/2025 11:37

Maybe he is hoping to rebuild some bridges but is not yet ready to apologise for his part in it or doesn't know where to begin.

My understanding was that once PH had got everything off his chest - OW, NF, Spare - he was waiting for an apology from them and then he would reconcile?

It's gone quiet on expectations for an apology.

It is always possible that he's looking for a face-saving ladder to climb down, and so is trying to get something, anything from the JR appeal that could be used in that way.

But it's just as possible that he's perfectly happy where he is, accepts that his demands for an apology will not be met, and is continuing with this case because he really believes that it is important that UK's security policy on how close protection is assigned really is that important

IcedPurple · 23/01/2025 12:09

It was still a very significant pay out which held them to account.

It may well have been a significant pay out, but that is nothing new and could probably have been attained months if not years ago.

However, since the case was settled out of court and no liability was admitted, I'm not sure how anyone was 'held to account'?

Not2identifying · 23/01/2025 12:11

@ProjectFailed Yes, I think you are right.

CharlotteCChapel · 23/01/2025 12:11

BemusedAmerican · 23/01/2025 01:55

I want to see what he does with what's left of the money after he pays his US taxes. Will he donate it to charities other than Archewell? To Archewell? Or just keep it?

Paying to Archwell is tantamount to keeping the money. The foundation is registered in Maryland and only 5% needs to go to charities.

Rhaidimiddim · 23/01/2025 12:15

DuchessOfPort · 23/01/2025 08:34

Re the taxes that he’d have to pay in the US on a settlement - I must say, if I were him, as a British citizen, rowing with a British paper, in a British court system; I’d definitely be handing over my British bank account details and trying not to pay that tax. I don’t know what could prevent him from doing that.

I think Meghan probably told him to drop it or else because of the short chapter of PR disasters over the last week or so. Expensive to lose if you are no longer as confident about your cooking show.

Initial reports (on Monday morning) were that costs were £38m. I can't imagine their combined wealth is anywhere near twice that. As his wife, she would be jointly liable for any debt incurred, if they could not actually pay it outright. I can imagine she had a firm opinion on how to proceed.

Not2identifying · 23/01/2025 12:18

@Rhaidimiddim Which is fair enough; I'd feel the same in her shoes!

Mylovelygreendress · 23/01/2025 12:19

OccasionalHope · 23/01/2025 10:28

I don’t see why he should give it away.

Well if he didn’t do it for the money , he should donate it to charity . According the Sussex supporters they are multimillionaires so they don’t need the money .

Longwaysouth · 23/01/2025 12:24

With an estimated 10 to 20 million he can definitely pay for his own ( and family) security if he chooses to visit the UK.

Baital · 23/01/2025 12:27

IcedPurple · 23/01/2025 10:25

We don't really know how big the pay out was. The figures being bandied about are mere rumour.

And a settlement was always on the table. NGN have settled out of court countless times, paying out up to £1 billion in compensation. So this is nothing new. Had the case gone to trial it would have been at the very least embarrassing for them, but I hardly think Harry would have come out unscathed either. It was in the interests of both parties to settle, but the fact is that Harry had been publicly resisting this until as recently as last month.

The judge was pretty clear that both sides were being obstinate and should have settled a long time ago.

Extiainoiapeial · 23/01/2025 12:28

"I think I am a pretty balanced person and the attacks here when you express your opinion are galling"

I'd like to think that, given the OPs statement, I can say that I am delighted that Harry and Tom Watson won their case.

Whilst many wil l consider it's not a win,there has never been such as fulsome apology ever.
I could say more here but won't

Sorry for the edits
My laptop has seized up

pelargoniums · 23/01/2025 12:31

smilesy · 23/01/2025 11:30

I wonder if his fees are so high because he has a mahoosive bill for all his hair products 🤔

My theory is Harry refused to turn up for the trial because of the hair optics: if I worked for the Sun (which secretly I’d love to do despite all the evil), I’d be working up a “Is Harry’s hair-raising trial a follycle? Battle of Bald vs Bouffant” angle

IcedPurple · 23/01/2025 12:34

I'd like to think that, given the OPs statement, I can say that I am delighted that Harry and Tom Watson won their case.

They didn't 'win their case'.

They settled outside of court and accepted money in return for dropping the case. So there was no 'case' to 'win'.

Extiainoiapeial · 23/01/2025 12:36

IcedPurple · 23/01/2025 12:34

I'd like to think that, given the OPs statement, I can say that I am delighted that Harry and Tom Watson won their case.

They didn't 'win their case'.

They settled outside of court and accepted money in return for dropping the case. So there was no 'case' to 'win'.

Whatever you want to think. Even the British media (some) are praising him

I'm pleased for him

IcedPurple · 23/01/2025 12:38

Extiainoiapeial · 23/01/2025 12:36

Whatever you want to think. Even the British media (some) are praising him

I'm pleased for him

Eh?

It's not what I 'want to think'. Unless you can point out what is factually incorrect about what I wrote above?

No 'case' was 'won', as you suggested. The case was dropped in return for a financial settlement without admission of liability. That's a fact, not my personal opinion.

Extiainoiapeial · 23/01/2025 12:41

IcedPurple · 23/01/2025 12:38

Eh?

It's not what I 'want to think'. Unless you can point out what is factually incorrect about what I wrote above?

No 'case' was 'won', as you suggested. The case was dropped in return for a financial settlement without admission of liability. That's a fact, not my personal opinion.

Good for him

Exposure matters

Have you read their statement? Well worth a read.

It's a win in my book

You can of course disagree. That's fine

Eh?

IcedPurple · 23/01/2025 12:44

Extiainoiapeial · 23/01/2025 12:41

Good for him

Exposure matters

Have you read their statement? Well worth a read.

It's a win in my book

You can of course disagree. That's fine

Eh?

You're moving the goalposts. It's not about 'disagreeing' or 'opinions'.

Whether this out of court settlement was a 'win' for either party is open to debate, and indeed it has been debated over the past day on the other thread.

But what I wrote above is factually correct. Harry and Watson did not 'win their case' because the case never went to trial. There was no 'case' to 'win'.

MaggieMistletoe · 23/01/2025 12:45

MrsFinkelstein · 23/01/2025 10:13

Thanks for the new thread OP.

I'm not a hater, I don't have particularly strong feelings about Harry (or Meghan) unless you count amused irritation and zero respect as strong? I view them now akin to the Kardashians.

As I said on the previous thread, I'm glad he got the public apology and got the settlement. My personal feelings are that because Harry made the approach to NGN about settling is that the settlement will be substantial but not groundbreaking. Hugh Grant had a much stronger case evidentially than Harry so I think a bit more that Hugh's but at the lower end of the figures bandied about.

The real winners here will be the lawyers frankly. Certainly financially.

Both sides can claim a victory of sorts. NGN didn't have to go to court and Harry didn't show systemic illegality at a corporate level Not a clear win for either, more and insipid draw???

I for one will miss the chance of hearing Harry on the stand mourning the loss of his relationship with Chelsy Davey once again. 😭

Even the Kardashian's deserve more respect than Harry and Meghan. At least they haven't lived the life of locusts off the taxpayer and don't (as far as I know) betray each other by selling stories on their family. They don't denouce entire nations (who paid out millions on their frivolity) as racist. And I'd be suprised if they were pathological liars to the degree that Meghan is, or bitter and angry to the degree that Harry is. And considering their huge fan base, they must be capable of portraying themselves as likable to a degree - Meghan is so inept at her own craft that she can't even act like she's a decent person.

Extiainoiapeial · 23/01/2025 12:47

IcedPurple · 23/01/2025 12:44

You're moving the goalposts. It's not about 'disagreeing' or 'opinions'.

Whether this out of court settlement was a 'win' for either party is open to debate, and indeed it has been debated over the past day on the other thread.

But what I wrote above is factually correct. Harry and Watson did not 'win their case' because the case never went to trial. There was no 'case' to 'win'.

Edited

Ok you win

But I am delighted with the grovelling apology from ole Rupert Murdoch's newsgroup

That's a win for me

You can consider it what you want

BasiliskStare · 23/01/2025 12:47

If I were Harry I'd be setting some of remainder after costs aside for any costs he might have to make if he loses the RAVEC case ( which I assume is a straight win or lose - not one for a settlement - or indeed id drops it would he still be liable for costs )

I can see why Harry would think of NDN as a win - he got it back in the news and his mother (I think) was mentioned in the apology but yes I am not quite sure what he has substantially done which Hugh Grant et al did not achieve at the time.

pelargoniums · 23/01/2025 13:03

Not2identifying · 23/01/2025 10:33

@pelargoniums Harry was a bit indiscreet after his visit to see Charles after he announced he had cancer. I remember footage of him talking whilst on a trip to Canada about how illness can bring families together. But you are right that the general trend from him has been to talk less about his extended family. Maybe he is hoping to rebuild some bridges but is not yet ready to apologise for his part in it or doesn't know where to begin.

Ohhh I remember – didn’t he also issue a press release saying he was flying straight over? Then spent less than 45 minutes at Clarence House, presumably with about 44 of those spent being berated by Charles about all the press releases. He does seem to have calmed down since then, though possibly because no one tells him anything anymore.

And in fairness I can’t fully remember if he issued a release or if his people were asked if he’d visit and they confirmed. I do remember it was all very dramatic and hasty, only to be met with a metaphorical “New phone, who dis?” at CH.

smilesy · 23/01/2025 13:13

He does seem to have calmed down since then, though possibly because no one tells him anything anymore

I have wondered if the reason we hear less whining about the RF from the two of them is partly because they are now completely out of the loop 🤷‍♀️

pelargoniums · 23/01/2025 13:16

And half of the big players from Meghan’s time in the UK are now dead, everyone’s changed roles and palaces and staff. They’ve not got expert insight because it’s all changed. It’s like when you revisit your old uni town and no longer know where the good kebabs are

smilesy · 23/01/2025 13:25

pelargoniums · 23/01/2025 13:16

And half of the big players from Meghan’s time in the UK are now dead, everyone’s changed roles and palaces and staff. They’ve not got expert insight because it’s all changed. It’s like when you revisit your old uni town and no longer know where the good kebabs are

Agreed. Harry doesn’t really seem to have grasped that things have moved on a great deal since he left. He keeps trying to drag up perceived injustices from his and Meghan’s time in the RF, but there has been a lot of water under the bridge since they made their dramatic flounce stage left. They seem stuck in a Groundhog Day

Rhaidimiddim · 23/01/2025 13:31

Not2identifying · 23/01/2025 12:18

@Rhaidimiddim Which is fair enough; I'd feel the same in her shoes!

Absolutely! No criticism of her from me on that point.

MrsGusset · 23/01/2025 13:33

After last night's bun fight I should like to point out that it is possible to be both pleased for Harry & critical of him at one and the same time.

That he was wronged by NGN cannot be disputed and their wrongdoing was of a particularly unpleasant, underhand and creepy kind. So Harry was most certainly due an apology and compensation and I'm very pleased for him that he received both.

However some of his statements regarding this case have been very foolish. The hubristic dragon slayer stuff was guaranteed to invite ridicule as was his “I'm the only man who can save the world” kind of attitude. Happily though this unfortunate grandiosity did shrivel just at the right moment when he was faced with reality & £££s .

The matter is now completely closed for NGN; they got the settlement they wanted which prevented Harry getting his day in court and no matter how many millions were paid in compensation it will be just like the small change down the back of Murdoch's sofa. So I suspect they are more than happy with the outcome.

Swipe left for the next trending thread