What? I’m not obfuscating. I think that’s you! You are the one bringing unrelated sex offenders in the mix not me!
Can you expand and specify on how these people have gained commercially?
You can’t understand how a newspaper makes money by writing stories?
Can you explain why MM when alleging the BP bullying allegations were a 'calculated smear campaign' and following the bulling expose in THR has not sued for defamation?
No, Can you? Maybe she tried but couldn’t prise enough information about the enquiry out of BP? Because, you know, it was all done in secret?
The only statement I can find from BP was that they were concerned by a report in the Times of claims that Meghan had driven out two personal assistants during her time as a working royal, while Kensington Palace staff had been “humiliated” on several occasions.
They went on to say,
“Accordingly our HR team will look into the circumstances outlined in the article. Members of staff involved at the time, including those who have left the household, will be invited to participate to see if lessons can be learned.”
Harry and Meghan queried the timing of this statement stating it was suspicious as it went out just prior to their interview with Oprah; another one with a commercial interest btw.
The Guardian at the time reported that,
”The source acknowledged that a direct accusation of responsibility against the palace by the couple had been clumsily phrased, but suggested “people in the royal orbit” were responsible for the timing of the story – and claimed it was intended to create scepticism over Meghan before the high-profile interview to be aired on Monday.”
Good to discuss both perspectives I think. If that qualifies as obfuscation in your mind then I can’t help you I’m afraid.