Those concerned could issue Freedom of Information requests about funding and whether Harry’s expenses is a factor of budgeting. How do they (Birmingham City) ensure taxpayer funds are spent properly and on the veterans and purposes of the games only? I assume the City works in tandem with the charity, or do they simply hand over £26m to the charity and do as they are told?
IG depends on volunteers. People can volunteer and get a first hand account of what goes on.
The CEO, Dominic Reid’s departure straight after the PT award, a few months before his brainchild of a winter games comes to fruition and right before this bid win has been announced looks even more suspicious now. A Birmingham Games will become all about “royal snubs”, “royal rivalries” and the ongoing drama surrounding the Sussexes. The veterans will be an afterthought in their own games. I do wonder now if Reid disagreed with this decision to award Birmingham because of the inevitable drama (that can be avoided on other soils).
From Harry’s point of view, will this be his excuse to spend an increasing amount of time in the UK over the next 2 years doing preparation and promotional events? If so there will again be all the discussions of snubs that didn’t happen, accommodation turned down as unsafe, endless discussions regarding RAVEC and security etc etc. All the Harry Greatest Hits. Once again, the veterans will be an afterthought.
Bids can be withdrawn even after the games are awarded. Victoria did it with the Commonwealth Games. I would be pissed off and nervous about the extremely experienced Reid’s departure for who knows whom if I was in charge of the Birmingham bid. Why they want to bring in all this potential royal drama on top of the economic, social and political drama already on the ground is beyond me.