Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Wildlife offences on Sandringham Estate - police can't properly investigate

16 replies

antelopevalley · 17/07/2022 23:23

Lots of wildlife offences were committed on the Sandringham Estate that the police have been prevented from properly investigating.

"A Guardian investigation has revealed that dozens of UK laws stipulate that police are barred from entering any of the Queen’s private estates without her consent to investigate crimes ranging from wildlife offences to environmental pollution – a unique privilege not granted to any other private landowner in the UK.
In fact, a year before the shooting incident in the vicinity of Sandringham, the UK’s wildlife legislation was updated. The Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 included amendments to a number of laws for England – one of which sets out the Queen’s personal immunity from prosecution for wildlife offences, and denies wildlife inspectors the power to enter her private estates to investigate alleged crimes.
But internal documents from Natural England, obtained by the Guardian, reveal that Sandringham has been the focus of successive police and regulatory investigations.
Sandringham has been investigated for wildlife and pesticides offences against legally protected birds of prey at least six times between 2005 and 2016.
As well as the two hen harriers shot in 2007, police and Natural England have investigated the deaths of a goshawk, a sparrowhawk, a red kite, a tawny owl and a marsh harrier at Sandringham estate and land it owns nearby, with only one prosecution.
In 2009, the estate was given an official warning about the mishandling and unlawful storage of highly toxic chemicals after the sparrowhawk was poisoned.
In 2016, Sandringham admitted it had destroyed the body of a goshawk found dead near Sandringham House before it could be examined by police, which meant no cause of death could be established."

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jul/15/sandringham-estate-police-barred-investigating-wildlife-crime

OP posts:
38DegreesAndRising · 20/07/2022 07:51

What is wrong with these people that they take pleasure in shooting beautiful wild animals. That they have immunity against the law being upheld is so wrong. I don’t know how anyone could defend this.

IdiotCreatures · 20/07/2022 07:56

This is absolutely vile. Shooting birds of prey? I'm all for the end of the monarchy. It's a ridiculous proposition and an archaic one too.
This is the 21st century and it's time for this hideous institution to end.

Samcro · 20/07/2022 08:04

that is really sad, such beautiful birds.

38DegreesAndRising · 20/07/2022 08:10

In the article it’s not even questioned that Harry and his mate are shooting ducks. Shooting ducks?! Why is that even normalised for these people?

antelopevalley · 20/07/2022 10:08

It is seen as fun by the Royal Family. They shoot all kinds of animals. Philip even shot a tiger once.
IT is how they are above the law that really annoys me.

OP posts:
CathyorClaire · 21/07/2022 09:51

Their fondness for blood sports is a disgrace and has been for years but the associated perks and privileges coming with it are eye-opening.

Freedom from police investigation, tax bills on shooting at Balmoral reduced to a rate below that of local hospitality businesses and let's not get started on the environmental damage they're doing maintaining grouse moors as playgrounds.

Awful people.

antelopevalley · 21/07/2022 09:55

And then they lecture us on climate change and environmentalism.

OP posts:
CathyorClaire · 21/07/2022 10:13

And try to convince us it's not one rule for them and another for everybody else.

Seeline · 21/07/2022 10:21

It's perfectly legal to shoot several species of duck, goose and other waterfowl as long as it is within the specified shooting season.
basc.org.uk/advice/quarry-species-shooting-seasons/

Not saying that it's right, but it can be legal.

antelopevalley · 21/07/2022 12:55

But shooting Hen Harriers is illegal and can lead to a prison sentence.

OP posts:
NewCatName · 21/07/2022 12:57

This infuriates me. Why do we put up with this? 😡

CathyorClaire · 21/07/2022 20:22

I would love to know that too, NewCatName

The only conclusion I can come up with is that the enthusiastic cap-doffers wear blinkers.

antelopevalley · 22/07/2022 12:20

Cause...arent they marvellous.
I could never do that job in a million years.
It must be so hard shaking so many hands.
etc etc.
Meanwhile, the Royal Family carry on doing exactly what they want as they enjoy their wealth and privilege.

OP posts:
Roussette · 22/07/2022 12:53

Don't forget antelope

I don't envy them they're in a gilded cage
I don't care what they do it doesn't affect me
They can do what they want, I just don't think about it
They work really hard and just get criticised

And so on....
It's all so Upstairs Downstairs Downton Abbey isn't it...

antelopevalley · 22/07/2022 13:04

It is very upstairs downstairs.
If it was exactly the same family members behaving in this way, but they lived in a large ex-council house, people would think very differently about them. Andrew would have been hounded out of the area, and probably Charles too for his support to a friend who was even at the time, a convicted paedophile.
It is real cap doffing attitudes.

OP posts:
DaniRabbity · 22/07/2022 15:08

Vile. We can't get rid of them soon enough.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread