@PottingBench
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CEO_compensation_among_charities_in_the_United_Kingdom
We rescue or help with re-homing, on average, 10-20 Golden Retrievers a month through our breed specific rescue. None of us take a salary, and we know a damn sight about our breed than the RSPCA, Battersea and Dogs Trust do. All of them frequently come to us for advice and support after they have failed, often multiple times, to re-home dogs and had repeated returns OR they refuse to give dogs to perfectly suitable families (something I have seen first hand when we have offered to find families for these dogs). Spaniel Aid (bigger than us) re-home dozens of dogs a month and their staff also don't take salaries.
I'm sorry, but these big animal charities are a disgrace. More breed specific rescues would make re-homing far easier, safer, and better.
And not taking action against the perpetrators in this case is not acceptable and just reinforces my (very negative) view of these charities. Nothing ever excuses animal abuse.
There was more going on here than the RSPCA will admit because there is no way anyone can afford to feed 250 dogs (anything else aside), without making some sort of income from them. This isn't a case of someone being overwhelmed as the RSPCA have alleged.
The sheer cost of feeding these dogs makes that impossible - even if many of them were not fat, and needed more food - you'd be looking at £13-15K a month (saying on average it costs £80 to feed a cocker spaniel, and there are 250 dogs would make it £20K, but I'll be generous and say they weren't getting the best food and some were starving).
So, once again, the RSPCA are being less than honest about what really happened (possibly because they have been advised that legally they should not be honest).
In other shocking news, the sky is blue, grass is green and water is wet.