Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The doghouse

If you're worried about your pet's health, please speak to a vet or qualified professional.

Designer Doodles - A Discussion Thread

148 replies

Killingoffmyflowersonebyone · 28/08/2024 16:57

Breed recommendation/discussion threads always end up as arguments between those of us who have been around long enough, worked in animal care, have a genuine passion for breeding and/or just love dogs, and those who want some form of designer doodles.

So, this is my attempt to create a thread where we can actually have a reasonable discussion on these dogs and we can point prospective buyers to a reasoned debate thread without hijacking their existing thread. Probably naive of me! But hey.

From my perspective, I find designer breeding to be dangerous, disingenuous and unethical. I have no issue with designer doodles when it is done properly. But I do take issue with people who buy them without realising the significant risks they are running and without doing their research;

Hypoallergenic: No dog is truly hypoallergenic. Doodle crosses go wrong in this instance as often as they go right. This means puppies are dumped often because of allergy issues.

Personality: Particular breeds have particular traits (springers are typically high energy, golden retrievers are very affectionate and loyal, Grey Hounds have high prey drives, GSDs have protective instincts etc etc). There are exceptions to the rule. But typically, these traits cannot be easily removed. Breeding doodle crosses does not mean you will end up with the best of both and you should always consider worst case scenario - what if you end up with the energy of both breeds and the extreme SA that, for example, cockers and poodles are prone to?

Health: Breeding two pedigree dogs from different breeds does not equate to a healthier dog. All breeds are predisposed to genetic and physical conditions. Just because health tests have been done does not mean the puppies will be healthy. That is why we work off EBV - which is only done with dogs within a breed. Labrador’s and Poodles both are prone to hip dysplasia, but you won’t find an EBV on a puppy and just because the parents are clear does not mean there will not be historical issues - which is why the KC is useful. Poodles and the breeds they are crossed with have a variety of (serious and expensive) health conditions - and some are inherent in both dogs, including PRA.

Farming: Very often (but not always) doodle designer breeders are unethical. They are often fronts for puppy farming and dump the bitches when they can no longer be bred from. They set themselves up as proper breeders, but they are not and typically people who buy from them are won over by a snappy website and confirmation of health tests. Buyers don’t ask the important questions; what happens to the bitch when she can’t be bred from, how many litters a year, how many litters in a lifetime, how many other dogs do you have, why do you breed. The breeders often do not properly vet their owners; they are, IME, more likely to sell to inappropriate families (spelling disaster for dog and owner alike) than a proper breeder.

I love cockerpoos - I’m currently fostering two puppies and their cocker spaniel mother (dumped whilst nursing), so maybe I am a bit bias. As a mongrel mix they are lovely; but they are a mongrel and they come with their own physical and personal a characteristics that are inherent in the breeds they are from, just as a GSD or a Flat Coat does, and I think too many people fail to realise that and are taken in by the disinformation about their personalities, their cute looks, health and hypoallergenic coats.

Of course the KC is not the be all and end all - and I have as many issues with it as the next person - but buying designer mongrel in the hope of getting a particular characteristic is naive and foolhardy. I’d welcome views from others - and reasoned debate, not simply naysaying and saying your own dog is perfect, because that’s your dog not the ‘breed’ as a whole - on why they worry about designer doodles or why they don’t.

OP posts:
CellophaneFlower · 29/08/2024 11:57

LameBorzoi · 29/08/2024 11:48

A lot of excellent breeders will rehome ex brood bitches. They tend to be extra super selective about which homes they go to. Best dog I ever had was an ex brood bitch.

Exactly. Some might even say it's more irresponsible to end up with a huge amount of dogs, rather than rehome them somewhere they'll get the full attention they deserve. There's a big market out there for fully trained, calm adult dogs, especially for older people who won't have the energy for a puppy, nor want their dog outliving them.

CellophaneFlower · 29/08/2024 12:01

tabulahrasa · 29/08/2024 11:56

They keep them.

I ended up getting another rescue, but when I was last looking for a puppy I was speaking to a few breeders about potential litters - they all had between 5 and 7 dogs, only ever one or two bitches that were of breeding age.

They tended to have a couple of bitches of breeding age, one or two older ones and then either a really old one or one or two boys… depending on the breeder.

You only end up with loads if you overbreed really.

You can breed lots of dogs without overbreeding each individual bitch, hence the need to rehome.

tabulahrasa · 29/08/2024 12:08

CellophaneFlower · 29/08/2024 12:01

You can breed lots of dogs without overbreeding each individual bitch, hence the need to rehome.

Overbreeding isn’t just overbreeding each bitch, it’s also breeding too many litters.

CellophaneFlower · 29/08/2024 12:15

tabulahrasa · 29/08/2024 12:08

Overbreeding isn’t just overbreeding each bitch, it’s also breeding too many litters.

I guess in this breeders case, if that were true she would have puppies she was unable to home.

It's all very well saying if she didn't breed as many people would rescue, but they probably wouldn't. They'd get a pup from a breeder that might not be as reputable and therefore fund them instead.

BlueberryPup · 29/08/2024 12:21

This seems like an excellent thread to share the newest Royal Veterinary College research, which finally proves what is being said for years: Cross breeds aren't healthier than their purebred ancestors.

In a little over 2 weeks I'll be flying overseas to pick up my first well bred puppy - she is to be a show dog and local breeders don't sell to show homes - so yes, I'm definitely biased towards one side of the argument, but I'll eat my hat if I find any doodle breeder who health tests and proves their dogs to the same extent the breeder I'm picking this puppy from does.

tabulahrasa · 29/08/2024 12:29

CellophaneFlower · 29/08/2024 12:15

I guess in this breeders case, if that were true she would have puppies she was unable to home.

It's all very well saying if she didn't breed as many people would rescue, but they probably wouldn't. They'd get a pup from a breeder that might not be as reputable and therefore fund them instead.

I didn’t say if she didn’t breed as much many people would rescue though.

People have many reasons why they wouldn’t want a rescue, but I do wish people cared more about how and why dogs are bred.

It’s a business but they’re healthy just doesn’t cut it for me as responsible enough. I’m aware lots of people don’t agree and that’s why they take less care buying a dog than they would a sofa.

CellophaneFlower · 29/08/2024 12:37

BlueberryPup · 29/08/2024 12:21

This seems like an excellent thread to share the newest Royal Veterinary College research, which finally proves what is being said for years: Cross breeds aren't healthier than their purebred ancestors.

In a little over 2 weeks I'll be flying overseas to pick up my first well bred puppy - she is to be a show dog and local breeders don't sell to show homes - so yes, I'm definitely biased towards one side of the argument, but I'll eat my hat if I find any doodle breeder who health tests and proves their dogs to the same extent the breeder I'm picking this puppy from does.

That link doesn't work for me. It's kind of a moot point really though as there are too many variables. A cross breed from two well bred parents is arguably going to be more healthy than a pure bred dog from less well bred parents. Pure bred doesn't always equal healthy. I think we can all agree on that at least.

EdithStourton · 29/08/2024 12:39

Pyreneansylvie · 28/08/2024 17:42

Point taken. I am guilty of hijacking their thread. I will go back and apologise.

The purebred debate is a particularly sensitive subject with me at the moment since half my family no longer speaks to me because I opted for a pedigree puppy again. No, my breed is not the best, no I wouldn't recommend it to anyone but it suits me and my lifestyle. But still people think they have the right to tell me I should have got a mongrel because they're healthier 😢I don't remember being lectured so much with past puppies. If I'm honest it has made me really miserable lately.

Anyway, I probably have nothing sensible to contribute here but I will follow the discussion with interest. Thank you for starting the thread.

I feel your pain. My SIL enjoys feeling superior to us because we spend 'all that money!' when we buy a puppy. Proven working stock, health tests etc, apparently count for nothing.

She bought her dog, by arrangement, from a man with a van in a motorway services car park. But it was inexpensive and a mongrel (lurcher), so she gets more cool points than us, apparently.

Sorry, not entirely the point of the thread, will read the rest of it now....

LionWings · 29/08/2024 12:43

We had a rescue dog for about 3 mouths who had a myriad of behavioural issues and ended up snapping and growling at the kids, after lots and lots of time of time training and with a dog behaviourist. The rescue (SPCA) basically said it was all our fault. Then rehomed her again and she was returned again within 2 weeks (they did apologise after that).

So we looked into puppies and wanted to get one where we were sure of the parents / breeds and read lots of things about spoodles being great family dogs.

Ended up with a cavapoo, 1st generation. This was important to me as I'd read they are less likely to have issues. The breeders were local and had had one litter previously, & kept one of the puppies. So we could see the parents and the previous puppy to gauge size and temperament. They were obviously all happy, healthy dogs. We were lucky enough to be first so got to pick the gentlest one (according to the owner).

He's an amazing dog. Kind, funny, cuddly, loving. He's always up for a cuddle or a belly rub. Sleeps until it's walk time or sits next to a toy with big eyes when he wants to play. We've never had any cause to worry about him with children but we were very very careful when the kids were young and with friends around.

So I never thought we'd end up with a 'designer breed' and never had any desire to. It was always the plan to rescue but we had such a terrible experience we felt it was better to go with as much a known quantity as we could. And absolutely the best decision ever

coolpineapple1 · 29/08/2024 12:45

I've had dogs all my adult life and always rescue mongrels. I was always sure I'd never buy a puppy or a pedigree dog. I've currently got a 6 year old and 3 year old rescues who are amazing but come with issues and quirks!! But we love them regardless and they are part of the family.

My teenage daughter is autistic and this year I got her a cockapoo pup. So basically went against everything I've always said and believed in!! I did a lot of research into the breeder, saw the mum and dad, health checks etc... and the pup is amazing. He is so chilled, been so easy to train and is so much fun. He's helped my daughter massively.

For myself I'll always have a rescue but in the instance it has worked out well for my daughter and her needs.

mondaytosunday · 29/08/2024 12:47

All breeds are in essence crossbreeds, they become recognised breeds after stabilising (for want of a better word).
I have an Australian Labradoodle, which is recognised in Australia by the MDBA as a 'breed in development'. He has a five generation pedigree and looks just like his father/grandfather/great grandfather etc.
I also have a miniature English Labradoodle. She is supposedly three quarters poodle and her dad is a registered miniature poodle and mum a labradoodle. I met both mothers.
I researched breeds and breeders. I googled the breeder, I read reviews, I looked at previous litters and pics of the grown dogs if possible. I have always had dogs from rescues when single or when a child, but as I had (then) two primary aged children this proved difficult, plus I wanted a puppy.
The first breeder did it for love of the breed, only bred one litter every two years and after two litters retired the bitch. At least that was what she said, though from her website this appeared to be true. She had her dogs tested and the stud dogs were also tested with low scores and I saw the paperwork.
The second breeder I was less convinced about - she had the paperwork but was a bit more shambolic in her animal husbandry! Again I saw the mum and saw the paperwork for the dad. Both breeders required a preliminary questionnaire, and a contract stating I wouldn't breed the female and to return the pup if there were any issues or I could no longer keep the animal.
I think there are unscrupulous breeders everywhere, whether purebred or crossbred. Any dog that is in vogue will be subject to puppy farming. People must research, visit the breeder and see the animals and their home and be prepared to walk away. A friend did just that after visiting a breeder. Even though she had done her checks she thought something was off, the mum was not available to be seen, and there were just a few too many puppies to choose from.
Having a waiting list is not an indication of good practise in and of itself either. Having a website with several different breeds may or may not be a red flag. Most breeders seem to concentrate on one or two breeds. My cousin breeds miniature dachshunds. She shows them too. She also breeds show ponies. She does not advertise but is known in the doggie/pony community and is well respected and sells through word of mouth. I suppose that's the best recommendation a breeder can have.
I'm not against poodle crosses (obviously). Or any cross as long as it doesn't harm the bitch. The extortionate prices are another thing, though if breeding two registered purebreds it will cost the breeder the same whether the breeds are the same or different. My dogs are 13 and 15 now, and I have been idly looking at rescues. The restrictions are many (I have cats too), which knocks out about 80%. I also do not want a bully or related breed. Nor a labrador (there seems quite a number of those in shelters at the moment which is curious). Breed specific rescues may be a better bet, but again having resident dog and cats limits choices. I think this also drives people to buy rather than adopt (snd I've seen adoption prices as high as £600) - availability. Having resident pets and children under 12 seems the biggest barrier.
I dint like the term 'designer dogs'. All dogs are designed. Cockerpoos are now the fourth most popular breed in the UK. Though I note the border collie is the second - a problematic dog for many! Labradoodle is tenth. (French bulldogs, which really had a moment a few years ago, are 15th.) in 2020 cockerpoos were 6th, and labradoodles didn't make the top 20. So it looks like poodle crosses are not as ubiquitous as one would have thought.

Killingoffmyflowersonebyone · 29/08/2024 12:49

@LionWings @coolpineapple1 - you're both proving my point! Thank you!

A well-bred and well cared for 'designer doodle' (as I call them) dog, can be such a lovely animal. Rescues can be so tricky - and not all rescues are created equal and they don't always display their true nature until a few months into being at your 'home' which, when you have children, is not always safe!

What genuinely worries me is that people buy the nonsense in the press about how perfect they can be and how healthy they are...and reality isn't always like that. If you do your research and properly get to know the breeder/the 'breeder' and the personality of both parents, then you go in with your eyes open. I just know so many people don't - hence why I saw such a high percentage of them when I was a vet!

OP posts:
LionWings · 29/08/2024 12:58

Those puppy farms are awful. We know a couple of highly strung 'cockerpoos', both bought online and shipped to them so never saw the parents etc.

Our neighbour's dog is gorgeous - a poodle / Sydney silky cross. He's the most social, characterful, funniest dog ever. But she admits she knew it was a puppy mill, even though the breeders tried to pretend it wasn't. I don't think I could do that, you'd just be supporting people keeping dogs in terrible conditions.

EdithStourton · 29/08/2024 12:59

IME a lot of doodles go to people who have no idea about dogs. They've never had a dog growing up, or never had one as an adult, so teach the dog nothing and do nothing with it except take it out on the lead sometimes, or perhaps let it off in the park where the lack of recall becomes a problem. It's a recipe for behavioural issues - no boundaries, no appropriate stimulation, little exercise.

The ones I see out and about regularly are happy little dogs.

And the other issue, obviously, is puppy farming. Fashionable small breeds and crosses=££££

LionWings · 29/08/2024 13:04

Rescues can be so tricky - and not all rescues are created equal and they don't always display their true nature until a few months into being at your 'home' which, when you have children, is not always safe!

This is exactly what happened with us. She was so stressed at the rescue that she appeared very docile but this was completely not the case.

CellophaneFlower · 29/08/2024 15:04

Just to add... a lot of people choose a poodle cross hoping for a non shedding dog. There's genetic testing available for this so it would be good if more breeders took advantage of it rather than just saying their pups "should" be low shedding.

My dog's sire had 1 copy of the non shedding gene (can't recall exact terminology now) and 1 copy of low shedding, therefore none of his offspring would shed profusely. He also had both copies of long hair and facial furnishing genes so none of his pups would have an "improper" coat ie a flat coated doodle. He had 1 copy of curly hair gene and 1 of straight hair so I knew my puppy wouldn't have straight hair as both copies are needed for this.

It's not always the luck of the draw or you never know what you're getting, with a doodles appearance if you research.

Pyreneansylvie · 29/08/2024 18:58

CellophaneFlower · 29/08/2024 15:04

Just to add... a lot of people choose a poodle cross hoping for a non shedding dog. There's genetic testing available for this so it would be good if more breeders took advantage of it rather than just saying their pups "should" be low shedding.

My dog's sire had 1 copy of the non shedding gene (can't recall exact terminology now) and 1 copy of low shedding, therefore none of his offspring would shed profusely. He also had both copies of long hair and facial furnishing genes so none of his pups would have an "improper" coat ie a flat coated doodle. He had 1 copy of curly hair gene and 1 of straight hair so I knew my puppy wouldn't have straight hair as both copies are needed for this.

It's not always the luck of the draw or you never know what you're getting, with a doodles appearance if you research.

Edited

All this is interesting. Thank you.

StuckOnTheCeiling · 29/08/2024 19:42

The thing that confuses me is how hysterical some people can get in their hatred of poodle crosses. I saw one thread on here where the poster wanted a cockerpoo. Someone laid in to her and told her to get a proper breed, and then recommended a Klee Kai. Which is a fairly new breed, developed by crossing other breeds, with plenty of controversy over how it was created!

Well bred cockerpoos can be fantastic little dogs. I used to know someone who is a trainer for medical assistance dogs - her opinion on them was that when bred well they were absolutely brilliant for her needs (intelligent, trainable, eager to please, etc) but that there was only one breeder in the country she would get them from (at the time, this was a few years ago).

Personally, I hope there are good breeders working together to turn cockerpoos (and potentially other crosses) in to a proper breed.

oakleaffy · 29/08/2024 19:46

BlueberryPup · 29/08/2024 12:21

This seems like an excellent thread to share the newest Royal Veterinary College research, which finally proves what is being said for years: Cross breeds aren't healthier than their purebred ancestors.

In a little over 2 weeks I'll be flying overseas to pick up my first well bred puppy - she is to be a show dog and local breeders don't sell to show homes - so yes, I'm definitely biased towards one side of the argument, but I'll eat my hat if I find any doodle breeder who health tests and proves their dogs to the same extent the breeder I'm picking this puppy from does.

I had a wonderful RSPCA Lurcher as my first dog- she was extremely healthy {after her serious neglect as a puppy, hence RSPCA involvement}

Her ancestry was never known, She was listed as ''Lurch X'' but she was very healthy after a year of getting fit, had a really strong, slow heartbeat that vets commented on - and I thought she has 'hybrid vigour'..until at approx 12 she developed a tiny limp that didn't respond to rest.

Osteosarcoma.

I was absolutely devastated, and it seems there is a heritable cause to this horrible disease.Greyhounds in particular are prone. Even though she wasn't a greyhound, there was probably some in her ancestry.

She was PTS at home within 12 weeks of an early diagnosis. {This is what the chief vet said she would do if the dog has been her own}

Health is the biggie.

Breeders should be aiming for healthy dogs who can function well, breathe easily, see clearly, without having their corneas raked by eyelashes, and be sound, without lamenesses caused from poor breeding.

Dogs should be both physically and emotionally sound.

Pyreneansylvie · 29/08/2024 20:12

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Needanadultgapyear · 29/08/2024 20:44

Cockerpoos are not a new thing, first mentioned in 1859 in The Times as a compact water and ground dog.
14 years ago most were breed as working dogs mine was from a litter breed to be agility dogs. I used him till he was 7 years old for agility and then retired him. Both his parents were Origen dna tested for PRA and cocker mum was hip scored.
However, I now see so many who have been breed with no care or thought and most of my cases with behavioural problems areCockerpoios in fact they are far more aggressive than the bulk breeds I see.

StuckOnTheCeiling · 29/08/2024 21:50

@Pyreneansylvie I guess personally, I’m not too worried about breeds dying out. I realise that a lot of people will be horrified by that! I just think, say the Otterhound. It was bred for a purpose, that purpose no longer exists. Loosing the otterhound is not comparable to losing a species which has evolved naturally. Dog breeds have been created by humans to meet a need, new dog breeds will be created by humans to meet new needs.

LameBorzoi · 29/08/2024 22:39

tabulahrasa · 29/08/2024 10:19

I’m not wrong, I think for a breeder to be considered responsible they should be breeding for a purpose that isn’t just selling puppies, showing, work or sport for example. They also shouldn’t be breeding so many litters that they have to rehome bitches when they can no longer breed from them.

You might have a lower bar for responsible than me, but that doesn’t make my opinion wrong, just not the same as yours.

But what's the problem with rehoming ex brood bitches, so long as they have been well treated and well socialised, and so long as the breeder is breeding for healthy pups with great temperaments?

partystress · 29/08/2024 23:06

Can someone please explain what’s ethical about showing dogs? Working I get, with some breeds. But showing?

LameBorzoi · 29/08/2024 23:22

tabulahrasa · 29/08/2024 12:29

I didn’t say if she didn’t breed as much many people would rescue though.

People have many reasons why they wouldn’t want a rescue, but I do wish people cared more about how and why dogs are bred.

It’s a business but they’re healthy just doesn’t cut it for me as responsible enough. I’m aware lots of people don’t agree and that’s why they take less care buying a dog than they would a sofa.

I take your point, but I do think most people do consider rescue before buying these days. Dogs aren't fungible, though. When I'm ready to foster / rescue, a pure-bred puppy isn't going to fill that gap, and vice versa.

There's also no shortage of homes for well bred well socialised adult dogs from pet breeds.

Swipe left for the next trending thread