I'm slightly thinking out loud here, but interested to know what others think
At the moment, we have a problem nationally
- there is something of a shortage of well-bred puppies; good breeders have lengthy waiting lists.
- there is great demand for puppies, and everyone wants well-bred puppies (or says they do; wilful blindness to puppy farms aside).
- puppy farmers, unscrupulous breeders and to some extent imported puppies are filling the gap between supply and demand.
Breeding dogs well is a very labour-intensive process, and the things which people often consider to be a sign of a good breeder naturally constrain supply, such as
- not having too many dogs in total
- raising the puppies in a home environment
- only letting each bitch have four litters (KC rules, used to be six litters)
- not rehoming ex-breeding dogs to make space for more breeding dogs
- always being able and willing to take back dogs if they need rehoming
All of these are completely justifiable
but the unintended result is that a good breeder cannot produce as many good litters as they otherwise might.
The barriers to becoming a breeder are quite high; anyone who asks about it on MN is told not to even consider it; indeed there is something of a stigma about it. I'm sure some of these people could learn all the necessities, and might even have a suitable dog for breeding. Honestly I'm not sure how anyone gets into breeding good quality dogs.
My suggestion is - could good breeders encourage their purchasers to breed from their dogs, if they grow up to be a good example of the breed? It could look like
- puppy contract features the requirement to bring the dog in for an assessment of breeding potential as a young adult, to include genetic tests for PRA etc etc.
- if deemed a good candidate for breeding, the original breeder identifies a mate and organises things
- bitch could whelp and rear puppies either at owners or breeders home, with support and oversight from the experienced breeder, depending on mutual preference, and return to the owner after the puppies go off to their new homes.
- dog lives in an entirely normal pet home for the vast majority of their life, without being rehomed at the end of their breeding life.
- breeder retains responsibility for things like returned puppies and future assessments of those puppies.
I'm sure many dogs, bitches in particular, with good genetics go off to pet homes and are spayed, while bitches with crap genes are bred in sheds and live miserable lives to make up for the demand.
I'm aware of some dodgy breeders of XL bullies etc using co-own type arrangements as a means to obfuscate the breeder licencing process, but this would be in many ways a welfare-focused means to improve the conditions of your average breeding dog. Ideally this would be coupled with a crackdown on the puppy farms (West Wales, I'm looking at you...)
Interested to hear what others think - with the overall demand of having supply of well bred puppies meet demand and puppy farms being put out of business because people have better options.