I have a 16 year old dog who is still insured with PetPlan. At 7 he was robust and healthy and he stayed that way until just before he turned 15.
He now needs meds for his arthritis and another daily med for something else, plus regular monitoring and bloods and even with the extra percentage of costs we have to pay due to his age, we are still better off insuring him than not. I put in a claim every 6 months for his meds and consultations and because it’s an ongoing health condition and he has lifetime cover, we only have the one excess to pay per year.
It’s not always big tests, ops or treatments that cost, as they become older, it can be ongoing monthly costs to keep them comfortable that add up. If you have a decent policy it can also mean access to things like physio, hydrotherapy or acupuncture for arthritis, which can really help some dogs. At his age, I wouldn’t put my old boy through anything invasive or major, but it’s still been worth maintaining his insurance policy.
He’s a crossbreed (Lurcher) so probably a little cheaper to insure than a pedigree Golden, but for reference, we pay £75.00 a month for the highest cover and it hasn’t gone up much in the last couple of years.
I also had another Lurcher who we lost at 7 after two years of eyewateringly expensive specialist treatment for an auto-immune condition. If he hadn’t been insured we would have lost him so much earlier and he would have missed out on two happy years while his condition was well managed, as there was no way we could have self-funded over £20,000 in vet fees in under two years. (One med alone used to cost us £400 a fortnight, he needed monthly vet checks and bloods and spent the first week he was ill as an ITU inpatient at a specialist vet hospital.)