I have a nephew who is struggling to look after his dog. He is a recovering addict, but is often still in trouble with the police, being arrested etc. his dog is much loved and well cared for, he always feeds her before himself etc. However, because he is often arrested it means that the dog has to be looked after by other people and it's just not an ideal situation for her. My dogs are old, crotchety and territorial about their home, so I can't have her. No other relatives are in a position to have her permanently either.
I had a chat with him and suggested that he re-home her. He actually thought that this was a good idea (it's taken a long time to get to this point), but said that because he was prosecuted for not having her under control ( she bit a policeman who was kicking her - she had barked and growled at him, he over reacted. The other policemen who were present at the arrest said in court that she had been provoked and the other policeman shouldn't have behaved like that), she is now classed as a dangerous dog ( this was in my sister's house, not in a public place). He said that he was told that if he ever wanted to re-home her, he couldn't, rescues couldn't and she would have to be destroyed.
Can anyone tell me if this is true? It breaks my heart to think it has come to this.
Sorry it's so long, I just want to find out if he's been told the truth, especially as he's finally coming round to the idea of re-homing her.