This is sensitive, so please bear with me whilst I explain. Nothing drastic needs to be done now, and hopefully not for a long time, but this is something I'm starting to give some thought to.
We farm, and have an elderly working collie. He came to us last year when his owners emigrated and we were delighted to have him to both work and be a companion dog. He's only 10, but he's spent most of his life working cattle, plus he's a thick set heavy dog, so he's riddled with arthritis and is in pain without his meds.
If he were a 'normal' pet dog, I would have no qualms about his quality of life - the drugs are working, he can manage 45 mins run a day, he adores a good stick and a muddy puddle, and gives every impression of being a very happy pooch.
The only fly in the ointment is that he can no longer work. This isn't an issue of 'farmers won't keep a dog who can't work' - he's my beloved companion, dd adores him, and anyway, our vets know that we adore our pooches and they get the best care.
Anyway, the issue is that he's desperate to work and his mind is still sharp, but his legs simply can't keep up. I'm concerned that this will cause him frustration and make him miserable. As I say, if he had only ever been a pet dog, then I wouldn't any concerns. However, because he's known a working life, and appears to miss it, does this impact on his quality of life? And if so, how do I factor this in when making decisions.
I suppose I'm asking basically - are walks and being a pet dog enough for him, or is something missing in his life which will get him down and make is life more miserable?
(I really hope this came across ok, I know that one day I may have to make a decision and I'm already dreading it).