..... because I think she has this idea that the dog will get better, or will cope without its back leg functioning.
Dog is 11, mixed breed - very similar to a Jack Russell, and until this point as fit as a fiddle.
Vet said to mum that some Jack Russell type dogs get on all right after this sort of injury without surgery. I suspect mum thinks this means 'without treatment'. She tends to hear what she wants to hear. She doesn't want to hear that it would be better for the dog to be put down, or for the dog to need expensive surgery and cage nursing afterwards, because she doesn't have dog insured, and she's going away for a month in about three weeks - can't put the visit off as her sister, who's she's going to visit in Australia, is ill with cancer
Meanwhile dog is on strong pain killers and hopping around the house looking a bit miserable.
Any thoughts?