While we're on this topic, I thought I'd mention something my dogsitter pointed out to me this week. She's a responsible breeder (I've known her several years and she's only bred one litter in that time) and had a copy of the Kennel Club breed register, listing all the puppies registered with the KC that quarter. You can tell from the details supplied how many puppies a bitch has had previously, how old she is, who the stud dog was, etc. Going through 'her' breed and interpreting the data that was right there, she was horrified/depressed to see litters registered to bitches who were barely a year old, sizeable litters bred on successive seasons, the same stud dogs used over and over, stud dogs she'd never heard of (and so not show-proven quality), lots of owners she didn't recognise from the breed club which she's been involved with for years. In other words, a lot of puppy farmers, or backyard 'we wanted Snoopy to have pups' breeders who just picked the nearest matching dog in the park.
And these are puppies registered with the Kennel Club. God knows about all the ones that aren't. It's not as if the Kennel Club go round these places and check; they just accept litter registrations from two KC registered parents. There's nothing to stop a puppy farmer getting hold of a pedigree pair and churning out as many puppies as they can sell.
Putting aside the whole other argument about whether the KC has an ethical responsibility to act on the data they charge to record when breeding guidelines are clearly set out by breed associations, it just underlines how many questions you should ask when researching your puppy. There are conscientious, caring breeders out there, but a KC registration alone isn't a cast-iron guarantee that the dog will have come from a good place. At the same time, however, if there is no KC registration and the dog is a pedigree breed, you should be very very cautious indeed.
Sorry for the essay, it just makes me so...
.