My grandparents (late 70s/early 80s) have had dogs forever - they used to have a farm so when I was growing up there was always at least four sheepdogs around. Now they are older they've stopped having sheepdogs because they no longer have the farm, but they have a corgi my parents bought them ten years ago - she is fairly old and a bit overweight, and to completely honest I'm not sure how much longer she will last. She's been quite ill recently, but keeps pulling through.
This would have been sad, but they could have coped. Except they had a second dog (a puppy of an old dog of theirs) who died suddenly of a heart attack when he was still fairly young. My grandparents are heartbroken, and it is unbearable watching them miss him so much.
My parents are thinking of buying them another dog from a rescue centre. Obviously a puppy is not a good idea, but an older dog would be fine. They have lots of outdoor space, and are still fairly active. My grandfather has cancer, and I genuinely think if they stopped having dogs it would be like him accepting he is ready to die. But is it cruel for a dog to have two owners who, in all reality, may die before them and who will become less active?
My parents or I would of course always look after the dog if my grandparents began to struggle, but they live far away and it would be pretty much in their sole care.
I suppose what I'm trying to ask in a roundabout way is - is it cruel to rehome an elderly dog with an elderly couple who in a few years may not be able to cope? I would feel terrible about putting a rescue dog through the process of losing its owner in a few years, but I can't watch my grandparents (and my mum who is worrying about her family) be this sad. My loyalty to my family says they need another dog, but there is a little voice saying they shouldn't have one...