We are wondering if the audience get a much better view.
I'm not convinced that they do. There was at least one question (last week or week before) where one man was out because, as he said, he just couldn't se it very well. I suppose it could have been an excuse, but he sounded genuine to me - like it's a common occurrence (unable to see small things in general, not necessarily being on a TV quiz show!) and something that he's just grown resigned to over time.
It's meant to test your mental observation and logic skills, not your visual abilities. Less lofty gameshows like Pointless and Tenable make adjustments for contestants who use wheelchairs or have mobility/standing issues - and you barely even notice it, because that isn't the factor that they're actually there to be tested on.
I don't like to generalise, and I may well be wrong, but I wonder if the people in charge of The 1% Club behind the scenes are young professionals, with excellent eyesight AND the latest technology at home; and it isn't something that they've really thought about. There's been at least one lady I can remember who has been on Only Connect and University Challenge (also The Chase, iirc), who is blind, and they've made equitable adjustments for her - the former two giving her the questions on a card in Braille so that she 'sees' the question at the same time as the sighted contestants do.
I realise that (sadly) probably isn't possible or practical when the question is an involved picture - but they could at least show it much bigger (possibly with individual screens for those in the studio who need them) so that those with reasonable sight have a fair chance too. If it were a 'Britain's Sharpest Eyesight' type contest, than fair enough; but that's not what this is supposed to be at all.