Her episode bothered me more than any other.
She apparently tripped up and managed to shoot him in the back of the head while facing him.
She didn't call the police or an ambulance.
She kept him in the basement for a few days before digging a hole in the garden (maybe making her children help, maybe not depending on who you believe.)
It was only 10 days later when his parents questioned her that she admitted it.
A few weeks before hand the house was signed over to her.
A few days before the shooting she bought a gun for the first time and asked to be shown how to load it.
Her daughter does not agree with her story and testified against her.
The abuse was never ever mentioned in the original trial.
I don't doubt she was abused by her husband, but her story doesn't really make sense? But then if she was abused, obviously her reactions would be different as she would be traumatised etc. Children are not adults so their testimony might not be able to be relied on, they could have been influenced by the In Laws etc. Abuse may not have been reported previously due to fear.
So after all that, I'm on the fence!